Affiliation:
1. Department of Gynecology The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang Shijiazhuang China
2. Department of Obstetrics The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang Shijiazhuang China
Abstract
AbstractAimTo compare the efficacy of chitosan and intrauterine device (IUD) combination with an IUD alone in patients with intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) who underwent hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.MethodsThis retrospective study assessed 303 patients with moderate‐to‐severe IUA (American Fertility Society [AFS] score ≥5) who underwent hysteroscopic adhesiolysis between January 2018 and December 2020. Using observational data under a cohort design, we emulated a target trial with two treatment arms: chitosan plus IUD and IUD alone groups. Second‐look hysteroscopy was performed in all patients 3 months after the initial hysteroscopy. The primary outcome was improved adhesion assessed using the AFS scoring system.ResultsThe baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups. The second hysteroscopy revealed significantly better AFS scores in group A than in group B (values: 3 [1–4] vs. 4 [2–6], p < 0.001; change: 63% [50%–80%] vs. 44% [33%–67%], p < 0.001, respectively). Significantly better menstruation conditions (improved rate: 66% vs. 49%, p = 0.004) and endometrial thickness (mean: 7.0 mm vs. 6.0 mm, p < 0.001) were also observed in group A than in group B. Moreover, group A showed a significantly higher 1‐year clinical pregnancy rate (40% vs. 28%, p = 0.037) and better quality of life (p < 0.001) than group B.ConclusionsChitosan and IUD combination showed better efficacy in reducing adhesions and improving clinical outcomes in patients with moderate‐to‐severe IUA after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献