Validation of a novel algorithm with a high specificity in ruling out MDS

Author:

Schulz Felicitas1ORCID,Nachtkamp Kathrin1,Oster Howard S.23,Mittelman Moshe24,Gattermann Norbert1,Schweier Sarah5,Barthuber Carmen5,Germing Ulrich1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology University Hospital of Düsseldorf Düsseldorf Germany

2. Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel‐Aviv University Tel‐Aviv Israel

3. Department of Internal Medicine A Tel‐Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Tel‐Aviv Israel

4. Department of Hematology Tel‐Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Tel‐Aviv Israel

5. Department of Laboratory Medicine Universitätsklinik Düsseldorf Düsseldorf Germany

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionA previously published web‐based App using Gradient‐boosted models (GBMs) of eight laboratory parameters was established by Oster et al. to facilitate diagnosis or exclusion of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in patients.MethodsTo validate their algorithm, we compared 175 anemic patients with MDS diagnosis from our German MDS Registry with 1378 non‐MDS anemic patients who consulted various specialties in the Düsseldorf university hospital.ResultsBased on hemoglobin level, leukocyte and platelet count, mean corpuscular volume, absolute neutrophil count, absolute monocyte count, glucose and creatinine, plus the patients' gender and age, we could not reproduce a high negative predictive value (NPV), but confirmed a useful specificity of 90.9% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 77.1%. 1192 of 1378 controls were correctly categorized as “probably not MDS (pnMDS)” patients. A total of 65 patients were wrongly classified as “probable MDS (pMDS),” of whom 48 had alternative explanations for their altered laboratory results. In a second analysis, we included 29 patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) resulting in only one label as possible MDS, suggesting that highly proliferative bone marrow disorders are correctly excluded.ConclusionThe possibility of reliably excluding MDS from differential diagnosis based on peripheral blood lab work appears to be attractive for patients and physicians alike while the confirmation of MDS diagnosis still requires a bone marrow biopsy.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference7 articles.

1. Primary myelodysplastic syndromes: analysis of prognostic factors in 235 patients and proposals for an improved scoring system;Aul C;Leukemia,1992

2. Incidence and prevalence of myelodysplastic syndromes: Data from the Düsseldorf MDS-registry

3. A predictive algorithm using clinical and laboratory parameters may assist in ruling out and in diagnosing MDS

4. Evaluation of dysplasia through detailed cytomorphology in 3156 patients from the Düsseldorf Registry on myelodysplastic syndromes

5. WHO.Hemoglobin Concentrations for the Diagnosis of Anemia and Assessment of Severity. Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System. World Health Organization Geneva.2011.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How we diagnose Myelodysplastic syndromes;Frontiers in Oncology;2024-09-13

2. MDS patient registries - achievements and challenges;Annals of Hematology;2024-08-23

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3