Creating the executive budget process: What was Congress thinking?

Author:

Douglas James W.1ORCID,Kravchuk Robert S.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Political Science and Public Administration University of North Carolina at Charlotte Charlotte North Carolina USA

2. O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs Indiana University Bloomington Indiana USA

Abstract

AbstractThe recent centennial of the 1921 Budget and Accounting Act presents an opportunity to reconsider the importance of the federal executive budget to American political development. Of particular interest is the apparent shift in political authority from Congress to the president that is sometimes attributed to the Act. The 1921 Act generally marks the rise of the modern presidency, where the president received a durable grant of authority. We examine the congressional hearings and debates regarding the budget process from 1919 to 1921 to assess Congress's expectations of the new budget system it was creating. We show that Congress expected to benefit from the executive budget process and did not view it as a threat to its budget authority. Congress recognized that the executive branch had influence in the budget process, but it preferred presidential influence to department heads’ influence. The 1921 Act, at least initially, enhanced the budgeting capacities of both the president and Congress in mutually beneficial ways.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,History

Reference54 articles.

1. American Presidency Project. n.d.Annual Messages to Congress on the State of the Union.https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents.

2. The Administrative Theory of William Howard Taft

3. Budget and Accounting Act of 1921. 42 Stat. 18.1921.

4. Evolution of the Budget Idea in the United States

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The decline of incrementalism in U.S. lawmaking;Policy Studies Journal;2024-04-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3