Reducing touching eyes, nose and mouth (‘T‐zone’) to reduce the spread of infectious disease: A prospective study of motivational, volitional and non‐reflective predictors

Author:

Wilson Mackenzie1ORCID,van Allen Zachary M.12ORCID,Grimshaw Jeremy M.13ORCID,Brehaut Jamie C.14ORCID,Durand Audrey56,Lalonde Jean‐François6ORCID,Manuel Douglas G.147ORCID,Michie Susan8ORCID,West Robert9ORCID,Presseau Justin124ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Epidemiology Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada

2. School of Psychology University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada

3. Department of Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada

4. School of Epidemiology and Public Health University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada

5. Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering Université Laval Québec Quebec Canada

6. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Université Laval Québec Quebec Canada

7. Department of Family Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada

8. Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology University College London London UK

9. Department of Behavioural Science and Health University College London London UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe route into the body for many pathogens is through the eyes, nose and mouth (i.e., the ‘T‐zone’) via inhalation or fomite‐based transfer during face touching. It is important to understand factors that are associated with touching the T‐zone to inform preventive strategies.PurposeTo identify theory‐informed predictors of intention to reduce facial ‘T‐zone’ touching and self‐reported ‘T‐zone’ touching.MethodsWe conducted a nationally representative prospective questionnaire study of Canadians. Respondents were randomized to answer questions about touching their eyes, nose, or mouth with a questionnaire assessing 11 factors from an augmented Health Action Process Approach at baseline: intention, outcome expectancies, risk perception, individual severity, self‐efficacy, action planning, coping planning, social support, automaticity, goal facilitation and stability of context. At 2‐week follow‐up, we assessed HAPA‐based indicators of self‐regulatory activities (awareness of standards, effort, self‐monitoring) and self‐reported behaviour (primary dependent variable).ResultsOf 656 Canadian adults recruited, 569 responded to follow‐up (87% response rate). Across all areas of the ‘T‐zone’, outcome expectancy was the strongest predictor of intention to reduce facial ‘T‐zone’ touching, while self‐efficacy was a significant predictor for only the eyes and mouth. Automaticity was the strongest predictor of behaviour at the 2‐week follow‐up. No sociodemographic or psychological factors predicted behaviour, with the exception of self‐efficacy, which negatively predicted eye touching.ConclusionFindings suggest that focusing on reflective processes may increase intention to reduce ‘T‐zone’ touching, while reducing actual ‘T‐zone’ touching may require strategies that address the automatic nature of this behaviour.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Applied Psychology,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3