Affiliation:
1. School of Health Sciences Southampton UK
2. Department of Nutrition & Dietetics Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Cheltenham UK
3. Department of Dietitics/SLT University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK
4. Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE‐C) Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex Brighton UK
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundNutritional status is compromised long‐term following oesophagectomy. Controversy surrounds the optimal route for nutrition support postoperatively and there is wide variation in the use of feeding jejunostomy tubes.MethodsA retrospective service evaluation was conducted for all consecutive adults who underwent oesophagectomy for a cancer diagnosis within a specialist centre between April 2016 and July 2019 (n = 165). Nutritional and clinical outcomes were compared for patients who received jejunostomy feeding (n = 24), versus those who did not (n = 141).ResultsPatients with feeding jejunostomy lost significantly less weight at both 6 and 12 months postoperatively compared to those without jejunostomy (p ≤ 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). This remained statistically significant in multiple regression, controlling for age, gender, preoperative tumour staging and adjuvant treatment (p ≤ 0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively). Median length of home enteral feeding was 10 weeks after discharge in the jejunostomy group. We observed minor jejunostomy tube‐related complications in four patients (16.7%). Of those readmitted within 90 days of surgery in the non‐jejunostomy group, nutritional failure was a factor in 43.2% of these readmissions. “Rescue tube feeding” was required by 8.5% of the non‐jejunostomy group within the first postoperative year, including 6.4% within 90 days of surgery.ConclusionsUse of short‐term supplementary jejunal feeding in addition to oral intake after hospital discharge is beneficial for maintaining weight after oesophagectomy. We suggest a future randomised‐controlled trial to confirm these findings.
Subject
Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference38 articles.
1. The global, regional, and national burden of oesophageal cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017
2. Cancer Research UK. Oesophageal cancer statistics [Internet].2019[cited 2023 Apr 19]. Available from:https://about-cancer.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/oesophageal-cancer/about
3. Oesophageal cancer
4. National Oesophago‐gastric Cancer Audit (NOGCA). National Oesophago‐gastric Cancer Audit 2019 Report [Internet].2019[cited 2023 Apr 19]. Available from:https://www.nogca.org.uk/content/uploads/2019/12/REF150_NOGCA_2019-Annual-Report-FINAL_19Dec.pdf
5. Reporting National Outcomes After Esophagectomy and Gastrectomy According to the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group (ECCG)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献