Determinants of radiation exposure during mobile cone‐beam CT‐guided robotic‐assisted bronchoscopy

Author:

Kalchiem‐Dekel Or1ORCID,Bergemann Reza1,Ma Xiaoyue2,Christos Paul J.2,Miodownik Daniel3,Gao Yiming3,Mahmood Usman3,Adusumilli Prasad S.4,Bott Matthew J.4,Dycoco Joseph4,Gelblum Daphna Y.5,Lee Robert P.1,Park Bernard J.4,Rocco Gaetano4,Solomon Stephen B.6,Jones David R.4,Chawla Mohit1,Husta Bryan C.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Pulmonary Service, Department of Medicine Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

2. Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology Weill Cornell School of Medicine New York New York USA

3. Department of Medical Physics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

4. Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

5. Department of Radiation Oncology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

6. Department of Radiology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

Abstract

AbstractBackground and ObjectiveRobotic‐assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) is an emerging modality to sample pulmonary lesions. Cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) can be incorporated into RAB. We investigated the magnitude and predictors of patient and staff radiation exposure during mobile CBCT‐guided shape‐sensing RAB.MethodsPatient radiation dose was estimated by cumulative dose area product (cDAP) and cumulative reference air kerma (cRAK). Staff equivalent dose was calculated based on isokerma maps and a phantom simulation. Patient, lesion and procedure‐related factors associated with higher radiation doses were identified by logistic regression models.ResultsA total of 198 RAB cases were included in the analysis. The median patient cDAP and cRAK were 10.86 Gy cm2 (IQR: 4.62–20.84) and 76.20 mGy (IQR: 38.96–148.38), respectively. Among staff members, the bronchoscopist was exposed to the highest median equivalent dose of 1.48 μSv (IQR: 0.85–2.69). Both patient and staff radiation doses increased with the number of CBCT spins and targeted lesions (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Patient obesity, negative bronchus sign, lesion size <2.0 cm and inadequate sampling by on‐site evaluation were associated with a higher patient dose, while patient obesity and inadequate sampling by on‐site evaluation were associated with a higher bronchoscopist equivalent dose.ConclusionThe magnitude of patient and staff radiation exposure during CBCT‐RAB is aligned with safety thresholds recommended by regulatory authorities. Factors associated with a higher radiation exposure during CBCT‐RAB can be identified pre‐operatively and solicit procedural optimization by reinforcing radiation protective measures. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings across multiple institutions and practices.image

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3