Barriers and facilitators to implementing self‐directed therapy activities in inpatient rehabilitation settings

Author:

Brusco Natasha K.1,Walpole Brianna2,Kugler Helen3,Tilley Louise3,Thwaites Claire4,Devlin Alicia1,Dorward Emma1,Dulfer Fiona3,Lee Annemarie L.5,Morris Meg E.4,Taylor Nicholas F.67,Dawes Helen8,Whittaker Sara L.1ORCID,Ekegren Christina L.1

Affiliation:

1. Rehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, School of Primary and Allied Health Care Monash University Frankston Victoria Australia

2. Safer Care Victoria Victorian Government Melbourne Australia

3. Allied Health Services Cabrini Health Malvern Victoria Australia

4. The Victorian Rehabilitation Centre and La Trobe University ARCH and CERI Bundoora Victoria Australia

5. Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care Monash University Frankston Victoria Australia

6. Allied Health Clinical Research Office Eastern Health Box Hill Australia

7. School of Allied Health Human Services and Sport La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria Australia

8. Clinical Rehabilitation University of Exeter Exeter UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSelf‐directed therapy activities are not currently part of routine care during inpatient rehabilitation. Understanding patient and clinician perspectives on self‐directed therapy is key to increasing implementation. The aim of this study was to investigate barriers and facilitators to implementing a self‐directed therapy programme (“My Therapy”) in adult inpatient rehabilitation settings.MethodsMy Therapy was recommended by physiotherapists and occupational therapists and completed by rehabilitation inpatients independently, outside of supervised therapy sessions. Physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and patients were invited to complete an online questionnaire comprising open‐ended questions on barriers and facilitators to prescribing and participating in My Therapy. A directed content analysis of free‐text responses was undertaken, with data coded using categories of the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM‐B model).ResultsEleven patients and 20 clinicians completed the questionnaire. Patient capability was reported to be facilitated by comprehensive education by clinicians, with mixed attitudes towards the format of the programme booklet. Clinician capability was facilitated by staff collaboration. One benefit was the better use of downtime between the supervised therapy sessions, but opportunities for patients to engage in self‐directed therapy were compromised by the lack of space to complete the programme. Clinician opportunity was reported to be provided via organisational support but workload was a reported barrier. Patient motivation to engage in self‐directed therapy was reported to be fostered by feeling empowered, engaged, and encouraged to participate. Clinician motivation was associated with belief in the value of the programme.ConclusionDespite some barriers to rehabilitation patients independently practicing therapeutic exercises and activities outside of supervised sessions, both clinicians and patients agreed it should be considered as routine practice. To do this, patient time, ward space, and staff collaboration are required. Further research is needed to scale‐up the implementation of the My Therapy programme and evaluate its effectiveness.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Occupational Therapy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3