Affiliation:
1. SA Health Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Mental Health Clinical Program Adelaide South Australia Australia
2. Clinical and Health Sciences University of South Australia Adelaide South Australia Australia
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionMental health personal safety tools aim to promote a recovery focus and empower an individualised approach to consumer care. These clinical tools are predominantly utilised in acute mental health settings with a person during or straight after a crisis. There is currently a gap in the literature regarding the preparation of personal safety tools in non‐acute mental health settings. This descriptive article discusses the learnings and outcomes from a co‐designed project that aimed to develop a personal safety tool suitable for a community mental health rehabilitation setting.MethodsSeven people with lived experience engaging within a mental health community‐based rehabilitation service were recruited through convenience sampling to participate in the co‐design project. A focus group approach was utilised during four group meetings to develop a personal safety tool template. Experiences and ideas about safety planning were transcribed during meetings and thematic analysis extracted key themes. Five steps underpinned the co‐design process that included identifying the need, establishing the co‐design group, planning, design and development, and review and closure.Consumer and community involvementConsumer involvement commenced at step two of the co‐design process. The completed personal safety tool was designed with consumer input and review.FindingsThe personal safety tool consisted of nine intervention components. Four key themes emerged from focus group meetings that informed the content of the tool: (i) ensuring the personal safety tool is individualised and meaningful, (ii) promoting exploration of personal strengths and interests, (iii) enabling opportunities to learn self‐management skills, and (iv) treating the personal safety tool as a dynamic and adaptable tool.ConclusionFindings suggest that a personal safety tool targeted to a mental health community‐based rehabilitation setting should have an individualised and preventative focus to mental health care. Embedding co‐design principles can support opportunities for meaningful consumer engagement and establishing consumer and clinician partnerships.
Reference41 articles.
1. Partnering with consumers: Do occupational therapists genuinely partner? Can we do more?
2. Co‐design and evaluation of a multidisciplinary teaching resource on mental health recovery involving people with lived experience
3. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. (2023).Partnering with Consumers Standard: NSQHS Standards. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Retrieved 11 November 2022 fromhttps://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/standards/nsqhs-standards/partnering-consumers-standard
4. Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review
5. Boston Medical Center (n.d.).Personal De‐escalation Plan. Retrieved 23 September 2017 fromhttps://www.mass.gov/doc/bu-irtp-safety-toolpdf/download