Utilising co‐design to develop a lived experience informed personal safety tool within a mental health community rehabilitation setting

Author:

Francis Anna1ORCID,Le Amily1,Adams‐Leask Karen1,Procter Nicholas2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. SA Health Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Mental Health Clinical Program Adelaide South Australia Australia

2. Clinical and Health Sciences University of South Australia Adelaide South Australia Australia

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionMental health personal safety tools aim to promote a recovery focus and empower an individualised approach to consumer care. These clinical tools are predominantly utilised in acute mental health settings with a person during or straight after a crisis. There is currently a gap in the literature regarding the preparation of personal safety tools in non‐acute mental health settings. This descriptive article discusses the learnings and outcomes from a co‐designed project that aimed to develop a personal safety tool suitable for a community mental health rehabilitation setting.MethodsSeven people with lived experience engaging within a mental health community‐based rehabilitation service were recruited through convenience sampling to participate in the co‐design project. A focus group approach was utilised during four group meetings to develop a personal safety tool template. Experiences and ideas about safety planning were transcribed during meetings and thematic analysis extracted key themes. Five steps underpinned the co‐design process that included identifying the need, establishing the co‐design group, planning, design and development, and review and closure.Consumer and community involvementConsumer involvement commenced at step two of the co‐design process. The completed personal safety tool was designed with consumer input and review.FindingsThe personal safety tool consisted of nine intervention components. Four key themes emerged from focus group meetings that informed the content of the tool: (i) ensuring the personal safety tool is individualised and meaningful, (ii) promoting exploration of personal strengths and interests, (iii) enabling opportunities to learn self‐management skills, and (iv) treating the personal safety tool as a dynamic and adaptable tool.ConclusionFindings suggest that a personal safety tool targeted to a mental health community‐based rehabilitation setting should have an individualised and preventative focus to mental health care. Embedding co‐design principles can support opportunities for meaningful consumer engagement and establishing consumer and clinician partnerships.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference41 articles.

1. Partnering with consumers: Do occupational therapists genuinely partner? Can we do more?

2. Co‐design and evaluation of a multidisciplinary teaching resource on mental health recovery involving people with lived experience

3. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. (2023).Partnering with Consumers Standard: NSQHS Standards. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Retrieved 11 November 2022 fromhttps://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/standards/nsqhs-standards/partnering-consumers-standard

4. Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review

5. Boston Medical Center (n.d.).Personal De‐escalation Plan. Retrieved 23 September 2017 fromhttps://www.mass.gov/doc/bu-irtp-safety-toolpdf/download

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3