Picky eating in children: Current clinical trends, practices, and observations within the Australian health‐care context

Author:

Chilman Laine B.1ORCID,Meredith Pamela J.12ORCID,Kennedy‐Behr Ann13ORCID,Campbell Gabrielle14ORCID,Frakking Thuy1567ORCID,Swanepoel Libby18ORCID,Verdonck Michèle1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Health University of the Sunshine Coast Sippy Downs Queensland Australia

2. School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

3. School of Allied Health and Human Performance University of South Australia Adelaide South Australia Australia

4. School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

5. Research Development Unit Caboolture Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Queensland Health Caboolture Queensland Australia

6. Centre for Clinical Research, School of Medicine University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

7. Speech Pathology Department Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Queensland Health Gold Coast Queensland Australia

8. Australian Centre for Pacific Islands Research, School of Health University of the Sunshine Coast Sippy Downs Queensland Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackground/aimChildhood picky eating occurs when there is limited intake or variety of food and/or unwillingness to try new foods. Within research settings, standardised assessments are used to describe picky eating behaviours in children. However, little is known about assessment practices of occupational therapists. Similarly, occupational therapy interventions for picky eating in the literature focus on; providing strategies for parents, and working with the child on self‐feeding skills. Despite this, interventions and strategies utilised by occupational therapists in clinical practice within an Australian health‐care context are unknown. This study examines Australian health professionals' observations of picky eating behaviours, the use of childhood picky eating assessments and interventions, and differences between occupational therapists and other professionals.MethodsHealth professionals (n = 179) were recruited through professional organisations, such as Occupational Therapy Australia. Participants completed an online survey between March and May 2021. Independent variables were reported using descriptive statistics, with logistic regression used to consider differences between occupational therapists and other health professionals. Conventional content analysis was used to analyse responses to open‐ended questions.ResultsThe final sample included 109 eligible participants, with an average of 8.5 years working with picky eaters. Results indicated picky eating behaviours aligned with those reported in the literature. Participants relied on clinical observations and workplace designed assessments. The most common interventions were education, coaching, and the sequential oral sensory approach to feeding. Occupational therapy participants were significantly more likely than other health professional participants to report always using coaching and education.ConclusionAlthough few health professionals used standardised or validated assessments, the use of education and coaching by occupational therapists aligned with the literature. Results highlight the need for more rigorous investigation to determine the sensitivity of current assessments to differentiate between clinical and typical picky eating, and the effectiveness of interventions for childhood picky eating.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Occupational Therapy

Reference57 articles.

1. Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process—Fourth Edition

2. Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency [AHPRA]. (2020).AHPRA and National Boards annual report 2019/20.

3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2020).Health workforce.https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-health/health-workforce

4. Reporting Guidelines for Survey Research: An Analysis of Published Guidance and Reporting Practices

5. A Retrospective Analysis of the Sequential Oral Sensory Feeding Approach in Children with Feeding Difficulties

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3