Nurses knowledge, attitudes and education needs towards acute pain management in hospital settings: A meta‐analysis

Author:

McCabe Catherine1ORCID,Feeney Aoife2,Basa Muluken1,Eustace‐Cook Jessica3,McCann Margaret1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing and Midwifery Trinity College Dublin Dublin Ireland

2. Emergency Department St James Hospital Dublin Ireland

3. The Library of Trinity College Dublin Dublin Ireland

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEffective pain assessment and management is widely reported as sub optimal due to inadequate knowledge and negative attitudes among nurses.AimTo determine nurses’ attitudes, knowledge and education needs towards acute pain management in acute hospital settingsMethodsPRISMA (2021) and guidelines from the University of York, CRD (2009) informed the design and conduct of this review. We included studies with registered nurses involved in direct adult patient care and acute pain management in hospital settings.Seven databases were searched (10 June 2020 and 21 January 2022): Medline (EBSCO), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL Complete (EBSCO), PsycINFO (EBSCO), Applied Social Science Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), Web of Science and the WHO Library Global Index Medicus.The review outcomes were nurses’ knowledge, attitudes and education needs towards acute pain assessment and management. The CASP Cohort Assessment tool was used to independently conduct a quality assessment of included studies. Data extraction was conducted by paired reviewers working independently of each other. A meta‐analysis of findings relating to nurses’ knowledge and attitudes towards acute pain management was undertaken using MedCalc software.ResultsTen articles with 1,478 participants met the inclusion criteria. Five studies addressed the review items of knowledge and attitudes while the remaining studies focused on knowledge alone. No study measured educational needs. This meta‐analysis found that only 45.59% (95% CI: 20.46–71.97) of the 1090 respondents had adequate or above adequate levels of knowledge about acute pain management. The proportion of participants with positive attitudes was 25.76% (95% CI: 11.01–44.12).DiscussionHigh levels of variability exists across the included studies which reduces their comparability. To improve homogeneity and comparability, adaptation of instruments should be kept to a minimum. Reporting knowledge and attitudes separately may highlight education, both theoretical and clinical as the focus for improving assessment and management of acute pain.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3