Early antenatal risk factors for births before arrival: An unmatched case–control study

Author:

Hubble Talia Rose12ORCID,Nair Manisha3ORCID,Aye Christina Y. L.45,Mathewlynn Sam45,Greenwood Catherine5,Impey Lawrence45ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Medical Sciences Division University of Oxford Oxford UK

2. UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health University College London London UK

3. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health University of Oxford Oxford UK

4. Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, John Radcliffe Hospital University of Oxford Oxford UK

5. Fetal Medicine Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust Oxford UK

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionBirth before arrival is associated with maternal morbidity and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Yet, timely risk stratification remains challenging. Our objective was to identify risk factors for birth before arrival which may be determined at the first antenatal appointment.Material and methodsThis was an unmatched case–control study involving 37 348 persons who gave birth at a minimum of 22+0 weeks' gestation over a 5‐year period from January 2014 to October 2019 (IRAS project ID 222260; REC reference: 17/SC/0374). The setting was a large UK university hospital. Data obtained on maternal characteristics at booking was examined for association with birth before arrival using a stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis. Data are presented as adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Area under the receiver‐operator characteristic curves (C‐statistic) were employed to enable discriminant analysis assessing the risk prediction of the booking data on the outcome.ResultsMultivariable analysis identified significant independent predictors of birth before arrival that were detectable at booking: parity, ethnicity, multiple deprivation, employment status, timing of booking, distance from home to the nearest maternity unit, and safeguarding concerns raised at booking by clinical staff. Our model demonstrated good discrimination for birth before arrival; together, the predictors accounted for 77% of the data variance (95% confidence interval 0.74–0.80).ConclusionsInformation gathered routinely at booking may discriminate individuals at risk for birth before arrival. Better recognition of early factors may enable maternity staff to direct higher‐risk women towards specialized care services at an early point in their pregnancy, enabling time for clinical and social interventions.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3