Orthodontic tooth extrusion to regenerate missing papilla adjacent to maxillary anterior single implants: A 2‐ to 7‐year retrospective study

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionRegeneration of the missing papilla adjacent to single implants in the esthetic zone has always been challenging, despite advances in vertical hard and soft tissue regeneration. Orthodontic tooth extrusion has been shown to effectively gain alveolar bone and gingival tissue. This retrospective study evaluated the effectiveness of orthodontic tooth extrusion on regenerating missing papilla between existing maxillary anterior single implant and its adjacent tooth.MethodsPatients who underwent orthodontic tooth extrusion to regenerate missing papilla adjacent to a single implant in the esthetic zone were included in this study. The gingival phenotype, orthodontic extrusion movement, proximal bone level, dento‐implant papilla level, facial gingival level, mucogingival junction level, and keratinized tissue width, of the extruded tooth were recorded at pre‐orthodontic extrusion (T0), post‐orthodontic extrusion and retention (T1), and latest follow‐up (T2).ResultsA total of 17 maxillary single tooth had orthodontic tooth extrusion to regenerate missing papilla adjacent to 14 maxillary anterior single implants in 14 patients. After a mean follow‐up time of 48.4 months, implant success rate was 100% (14/14), with none of the orthodontically extruded teeth being extracted. After a mean extrusion and retention period of 14.3 months, a mean orthodontic extrusion movement of 4.62 ± 0.78 mm was noted with a mean proximal bone level gain of 3.54 ± 0.61 mm (77.0% efficacy), dento‐implant papilla level gain of 3.98 ± 0.81 mm (86.8% efficacy), and facial gingival tissue gain of 4.27 mm ± 0.55 mm (93.4% efficacy). A mean keratinized tissue width gain of 4.17 ± 0.49 mm with minimal mean mucogingival junction level change of 0.10 ± 0.30 mm were observed. The efficacy of orthodontic eruption movement on dento‐implant papilla gain was less in the thin (80.5%) phenotype group when compared with that in the thick (91.5%) phenotype group.ConclusionsWithin the confines of this study, orthodontic extrusion is an effective, noninvasive method in regenerating mid‐term stable proximal bone and papilla adjacent to maxillary anterior single implants.Clinical SignificanceThis retrospective study presents a mid‐term result on orthodontic extrusion as a mean to regenerate dento‐implant papilla defect. The extended retention period following orthodontic extrusion showed stable and efficacious proximal bone and papilla gain.