Coverage stability of peri‐implant soft tissue dehiscence: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe occurrence of peri‐implant soft tissue dehiscence, especially in the esthetic zone, can be challenging. This study sought to investigate how the passage of time affects the outcomes of treatment for peri‐implant soft tissue dehiscence coverage.Materials and MethodsA literature search was performed up to April 2023 via PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to retrieve studies reporting the data on peri‐implant soft tissue dehiscence of at least 2‐time points (baseline and follow‐up). Clinical trials with a minimum of 5 participants, reporting at least 1 primary outcome, and with a minimum follow‐up of 3 months were included. The primary outcomes were the changes in dehiscence depth, complete coverage, and mean coverage at different time points.ResultsSeven studies with 112 participants and 119 implants were included. Dehiscence depth increased insignificantly between 3 to 6 months. Although the dehiscence depth increased from 6 to 12 months in the tunnel group, it decreased in the coronally advanced group, and a slight decrease was observed from 12 to 72 months. Soft tissue thickness was the predictor for soft tissue margin stability. However, no significant relationship was found between the baseline dehiscence depth and complete coverage.ConclusionsWithin the limitations of this study, it seems prudent to wait at least 6 months to achieve a stable soft tissue margin.Clinical SignificanceThe occurrence of peri‐implant soft tissue dehiscence, especially in the esthetic zone, can be a challenging complication. It is important not only to achieve coverage but also to ensure that the treatment results remain stable in the long term, in order to satisfy both patients and clinicians. A reasonable approach would be to wait for at least 6 months to achieve a stable soft tissue margin.