Why do we evaluate 30‐day readmissions in general medicine? A historical perspective and contemporary data

Author:

James Jonathan1,Tan Sheryn2ORCID,Stretton Brandon23ORCID,Kovoor Joshua G.234,Gupta Aashray K.25,Gluck Samuel26,Gilbert Toby23ORCID,Sharma Yogesh1ORCID,Bacchi Stephen123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Flinders University Adelaide South Australia Australia

2. University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia

3. Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia

4. Queen Elizabeth Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia

5. Gold Coast University Hospital Gold Coast Queensland Australia

6. Lyell McEwin Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia

Abstract

AbstractReducing preventable readmissions is important to help manage current strains on healthcare systems. The metric of 30‐day readmissions is commonly cited in discussions regarding this topic. While such thresholds have contemporary funding implications, the rationale for individual cut‐off points is partially historical in nature. Through the examination of the basis for the analysis of 30‐day readmissions, greater insight into the possible benefits and limitations of such a metric may be obtained.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3