Affiliation:
1. Leiden University Institute for History The Netherlands
Abstract
AbstractWhy did nineteenth‐century German historians and physicists habitually warn against vices that they believed philosophers in particular embodied: speculation, absence of common sense, and excessive systematizing? Drawing on a rich array of sources, this article interprets this vice‐charging as a rhetorical practice aimed at delineating empirical research from Naturphilosophie and Geschichtsphilosophie as practiced in the heyday of German Idealism. The strawman of “the philosopher” as invoked by historians and physicists served as a negative model for strongly empiricist scholars committed to virtues like precision, thoroughness, and conscientiousness. In their historical narratives, historians and physicists consistently depicted philosophy either as a relic from the past or as a phase that they had virtuously left behind. This boundary work was central to the self‐positioning of both history and physics, which makes clear that the persona of the philosopher mattered not only to philosophers but also to scholars in adjacent disciplines.
Reference102 articles.
1. Review of Vergleichende Erdkunde, by Ernst Kapp;B[ernardi?], Th[eodor?];Historische Zeitschrift,1869
2. Varieties of Epistemic Vice
3. CLOSED-MINDEDNESS AND DOGMATISM