Affiliation:
1. Department of Philosophy University of Ottawa Canada
Abstract
AbstractWhat are academic hoaxes, and what should we make of them? This paper argues that academic hoaxes are exercises in pretense, with a complex structure involving both a focal item and a self‐revealing dimension, all governed by attitudes about the relevant sort of academic work, that are derivative yet different from the attitudes found in normal participation in publication. Hoaxes done primarily for humorous purposes are unproblematic. Serious academic hoaxes are both inherently risky and poorly suited to accomplish their ends, making them an undesirable feature of the contemporary academic landscape.
Reference22 articles.
1. The Hermeneutics of a Hoax: On the Mismatch of Physics and Cultural Criticism;Babich Babette E.;Common Knowledge,1997
2. Un ‘philosophe français’ label rouge: Relecture tripodienne d'Alain Badiou;Barberousse Anouk;Zilsel.,2016
3. Scientific conclusions need not be accurate, justified, or believed by their authors
4. Publishing without (some) belief
5. The Art of the Hoax