Affiliation:
1. School of Psychology Deakin University Geelong Victoria Australia
2. The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria Melbourne Victoria Australia
3. Institute for Health Transformation Deakin University Geelong Victoria Australia
4. Diabetes Victoria Melbourne Victoria Australia
5. #dedoc° labs GmbH Berlin Germany
Abstract
AbstractAimThis study examines potential intended (attitudes, motivation and self‐efficacy) and unintended (stigmatisation of diabetes) consequences of past Australian National Diabetes Week campaign videos. Further, outcomes are compared by the extent to which participants perceived their allocated video as stigmatising diabetes.MethodsIn this cross‐sectional, ten‐arm study, participants (adults with or without diabetes; 1:2 ratio) were randomly allocated to view one of eight archival diabetes campaign videos (intervention), or either an active or passive control group. Post‐exposure, study‐specific scales measured diabetes Misconceptions and Seriousness, General and Diabetes Risk‐Reduction Motivation and Self‐efficacy, and perceptions of video Stigmatisation of diabetes. Scores were compared by condition (intervention vs. control) and by campaign Stigma (highest vs. lowest tertile score), separately by cohort (with or without diabetes).ResultsThe sample included n = 1023 without diabetes; and n = 510 with diabetes (79% type 2 diabetes). No significant differences in outcomes were observed between conditions (intervention vs. control), with one exception: a modest effect on General Self‐efficacy among those without diabetes only. Those perceiving high campaign Stigma (15%), relative to low Stigma (60%), reported significantly greater diabetes Misconceptions, lower perceived Seriousness and (among those without diabetes only) lower General Motivation but higher Diabetes Risk Reduction Motivation.ConclusionThough limited to a single‐exposure, we found little meaningful positive influence of past diabetes campaign videos on diabetes attitudes, behavioural intentions or self‐efficacy. Further, campaign videos were perceived as stigmatising by a minority—a potential harmful impact. This novel study has implications for the design, implementation and evaluation of future diabetes campaigns.