Unraveling the effectiveness of antibiotics for peri‐implantitis treatment: A scoping review

Author:

Feres Magda123ORCID,Martins Rodrigo2,Souza João Gabriel S.24ORCID,Bertolini Martinna5,Barão Valentim A. R.6ORCID,Shibli Jamil A.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oral Medicine, Infection, and Immunity Harvard School of Dental Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA

2. Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Division Guarulhos University (UnG) Sāo Paulo Brazil

3. The Forsyth Institute Cambridge Massachusetts USA

4. Research Division Dental Science School (Faculdade de Ciências Odontológicas—FCO) Montes Claros Brazil

5. Department of Periodontics and Preventive Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

6. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School University of Campinas (UNICAMP) Sāo Paulo Brazil

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAntibiotics are the most effective adjuncts in the treatment of periodontitis. However, the benefits of these agents in treating peri‐implantitis are still debatable and demand further analysis.PurposeThe aim of this review was to critically appraise the literature on the use of antibiotics to treat peri‐implantitis, with the ultimate goal of supporting evidence‐based clinical recommendations, defining gaps in knowledge and guiding future studies on this topic.MethodsA systematized literature search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane Library databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on patients with peri‐implantitis treated by mechanical debridement‐only or with adjunctive use of local or systemic antibiotics. Clinical and microbiological data were extracted from the RCTs included. The findings were critically reviewed, interpreted, and discussed. An overview of antibiotic‐loaded dental implant materials in peri‐implantitis treatment was also provided.ResultsTwelve RCTs testing local/systemic antibiotics were included. Although not always statistically significant, all antibiotic‐treated groups had greater reductions in mean PD than those treated by mechanical debridement‐only. The only clinically relevant antibiotic protocol supported by one RCT with low risk of bias and long‐lasting benefits was systemic metronidazole (MTZ). Studies using ultrasonic debridement reported better outcomes. No RCTs to date have tested MTZ‐only or with amoxicillin (AMX) as adjuncts to open‐flap implant debridement. In vitro/animal studies suggested that biomaterials with antimicrobial properties are promising to treat peri‐implantitis.ConclusionThere are insufficient data to support a particular evidence‐based antibiotic protocol to treat peri‐implantitis using surgical or nonsurgical therapy, but some conclusions may be drawn. Systemic MTZ adjunct to ultrasonic debridement is an effective protocol to improve the outcomes of nonsurgical treatment. Future studies should assess the clinical and microbiological effects of MTZ and MTZ + AMX as adjuncts to optimal nonsurgical implant decontamination protocols or open‐flap debridement. In addition, new locally delivered drugs and antibiotic‐loaded surfaces should be assessed by RCTs.

Funder

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Dentistry,Oral Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3