How to make a digital reconstruction of the human ribcage

Author:

López‐Rey José M.12ORCID,García‐Martínez Daniel345ORCID,Bastir Markus1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Paleoanthropology Group, Department of Paleobiology Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN‐CSIC) Madrid Spain

2. Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM) Madrid Spain

3. Physical Anthropology Unit, Department of Biodiversity, Ecology, and Evolution, Faculty of Biological Sciences Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) Madrid Spain

4. Laboratory of Forensic Anthropology Centre for Functional Ecology Department of Life Sciences University of Coimbra (UC) Portugal

5. Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana (CENIEH) Burgos Spain

Abstract

AbstractUp to now, there have been no publication standardizing the digital reconstruction of the modern human ribcage from commingled costo‐vertebral material. Consequently, we designed a validated protocol based on anatomical features observed in the literature and the CT scanned ribcages of 10 adult European individuals. After quantifying the shape of these ribcages using 3D geometric morphometrics, we split each vertebra and rib within their corresponding (semi)landmarks. Subsequently, individual bones + (semi)landmarks were imported to LhpFusionBox, commingled and 3D reconstructed. To validate the accuracy of the protocol, we first reconstructed a randomly chosen ribcage three times and then compared these reconstructions to the rest of the sample. Since these reconstructions were closer to their original counterpart than to the others, the remaining sample was reconstructed once. Next, we tested the intra‐observer error during reconstructing using the Procrustes distances among the original ribcages and the reconstructions. We observed that first each ribcage reconstruction was clustered to its original counterpart and second there was a learning curve showing an improvement in the reconstruction process over time. Subsequently, we explored general size and shape differences among the original and reconstructed ribcages through a study of centroid size and a permutation test on the Procrustes distances (10,000 permutations), respectively. Specific shape differences between both groups were further examined through a principal component analysis in shape space. None of these analyses found statistical differences between the original and reconstructed ribcages (p > 0.05). Eventually, we extracted the mean shapes of the original ribcages and the reconstructions in order to visualize potential deviations caused by the anatomical considerations of the researcher. These results demonstrate that the protocol is accurate enough to be used when reconstructing a disarticulated human ribcage.

Funder

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación

Publisher

Wiley

Reference38 articles.

1. Adams D. Collyer M. Kaliontzopoulou A.&Baken E.(2022)Geomorph: software for geometric morphometric analyses. R Package Version 4.0.4. Available from:https://cran.r‐project.org/package=geomorph

2. Differential Growth and Development of the Upper and Lower Human Thorax

3. Geometric Morphometric Studies in the Human Spine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Eco‐geographic and sexual variation of the ribcage in Homo sapiens;Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews;2024-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3