Biofilm formation on metal alloys and coatings, zirconia, and hydroxyapatite as implant materials in vivo

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesComposition of implant material and its surface structure is decisive for oral biofilm accumulation. This study investigated biofilm formation on eight different materials.Materials and MethodsEighteen healthy subjects wore intraoral splints fitted with two sets of eight materials for 24 h: zirconia [ZrO2]; silver‐gold–palladium [AgAuPd]; titanium zirconium [TiZr]; Pagalinor [PA]; hydroxyapatite [HA]; silver‐platinum [AgPt]; titanium aluminum niobium [TAN]; titanium grade4 [TiGr4]. Total biomass was stained by safranin to assess plaque accumulation while conventional culturing (CFU) was conducted to investigate viable parts of the biofilm. Cell viability of human gingival fibroblasts (HGF‐1) was assessed in vitro. Statistical evaluation was performed with linear mixed‐effects models to compare materials (geometric mean ratios, 95% CI), with the level of significance set at ɑ = .05.ResultsLess biofilm mass and CFU were found on noble metal alloys (AgPt, AgAuPd, and PA). Compared to AgPt, PA had 2.7‐times higher biofilm mass value, AgAuPd was 3.9‐times, TiGr4 was 4.1‐times, TiZr was 5.9‐times, TAN was 7.7‐times, HA was 7.8‐times, and ZrO2 was 9.1‐times higher (each p < .001). Similarly, CFU data were significantly lower on AgPt, AgAuPd had 4.1‐times higher CFU values, PA was 8.9‐times, TiGr4 was 11.2‐times, HA was 12.5‐times, TiZr was 13.3‐times, TAN was 16.9‐times, and ZrO2 was 18.5‐times higher (each p < .001). HGF‐1 viability varied between 47 ± 24.5% (HA) and 94.4 ± 24.6% (PA).ConclusionNoble alloys are considered as beneficial materials for the transmucosal part of oral implants, as less biofilm mass, lower bacterial counts, and greater cell viability were detected than on titanium‐ or zirconia‐based materials.