Exercise variables and pain threshold reporting for strength training protocols in people with haemophilia: A systematic review of clinical trials

Author:

Cruz‐Montecinos Carlos123ORCID,Núñez‐Cortés Rodrigo12ORCID,Chimeno‐Hernández Ana2ORCID,López‐Bueno Rubén456ORCID,Andersen Lars Louis5ORCID,Mendez‐Rebolledo Guillermo7ORCID,Pérez‐Alenda Sofía2ORCID,Calatayud Joaquín56ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physical Therapy Faculty of Medicine University of Chile Santiago Chile

2. Physiotherapy in Motion Multispeciality Research Group (PTinMOTION), Department of Physiotherapy University of Valencia Valencia Spain

3. Section of Research, Innovation and Development in Kinesiology, Kinesiology Unit San José Hospital Santiago Chile

4. Department of Physical Medicine and Nursing University of Zaragoza Spain

5. National Research Centre for the Working Environment Copenhagen Denmark

6. Exercise Intervention for Health Research Group (EXINH‐RG), Department of Physiotherapy University of Valencia Valencia Spain

7. Laboratorio de Investigación Somatosensorial y Motora, Escuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Salud Universidad Santo Tomás Santiago de Chile Chile

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionAlthough strength exercise is often prescribed for people with haemophilia (PWH), it remains unknown how exercise variables and pain thresholds are used to prescribe strength training in PWH.AimTo analyse how strength exercise variables and pain thresholds have been used to prescribe strength training in PWH.MethodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL and CINAHL databases from inception to 7 September 2022. Studies whose intervention included strengthening training in adults with haemophilia were included. Two independent reviewers were involved in study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment.ResultsEighteen studies were included. The least reported variables among the studies were: prophylactic factor coverage (11.1%), pain threshold/tolerability (5.6%), intensity (50%), total or partial range of motion (27.8%), time under tension (27.8%), attentional focus modality (0%), therapist experience in haemophilia (33.3%) and adherence assessment (50%). In contrast, weekly frequency (94.4%), duration (weeks) (100%), number of sets/repetitions (88.9%), repetitions to failure/not to failure (77.8%), types of contraction (77.8%), rest duration (55.6%), progression (55.6%), supervision (77.8%), exercise equipment (72.2%) and adverse event record (77.8%) had a higher percentage of reported (>50% of studies).ConclusionFuture research on strength training for PWH should improve information on pain threshold and other important variables such as prophylactic factor coverage, intensity, range of motion, time under tension, attentional focus modality, therapist experience in haemophilia and adherence assessment. This could improve clinical practice and comparison of different protocols.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Hematology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3