The focal concerns of jurors evaluating mitigation: Evidence from federal capital jury forms-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The focal concerns of jurors evaluating mitigation: Evidence from federal capital jury forms

Published:2022-05-19 Issue:2 Volume:56 Page:213-236
ISSN:0023-9216
Container-title:Law & Society Review
language:en
Short-container-title:Law & Society Review

Author:

Rose Mary R.¹^ORCID,Rountree Meredith Martin²

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology University of Texas at Austin Austin Texas USA

2. Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Chicago Illinois USA

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/lasr.12602

Reference63 articles.

1. American Bar Association.2003. “Guideline 10.11 – The Defense Case Concerning Penalty.”https://www.americanbar.org/groups/committees/death_penalty_representation/resources/aba_guidelines/2003-guidelines/2003-guideline-10-11/

2. The Use of Peremptory Challenges in Capital Murder Trials: A Legal and Empirical Analysis;Baldus David C.;University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law,2001

3. How Jurors Decide on Death: Guilt Is Overwhelming; Aggravation Requires Death; and Mitigation Is NO Excuse;Bentele Ursula;Brooklyn Law Review,2001

4. Statistical Difficulties in Determining the Role of Race in Capital Cases: A Re-analysis of Data from the State of Maryland*

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Time lost as a result of wrongful conviction: the impact of race and official misconduct across offense categories;Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice;2024-07-02

2. Prosecuting overdose: An exploratory study of prosecutorial motivations for drug-induced homicide prosecutions in North Carolina;International Journal of Drug Policy;2024-03

3. Choosing Between Life and Death;The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Legal Decision-Making;2024-02-29