Author:
Taylor Matthew M.,Buranelli Vinícius C.
Abstract
AbstractBrazilians often complain that investigations of corruption by public servants drag on for years or bring few legal sanctions on the perpetrators. This lack of accountability is so pervasive that a slang phrase, acabou em pizza, is often invoked when investigations are inconclusive. This article investigates the role of four Brazilian public institutions charged with keeping public servants accountable. For analysis, it breaks the accountability process into its three component stages: oversight, investigation, and sanction. Through a study of six prominent cases of corruption, it shows that the weakness of the accountability process in Brazil is due not entirely to the toothlessness of individual institutions of accountability, but also to the independence of such institutions at each of the three stages. These findings suggest that institutional arrangements influence the degree of accountability, and thereby also public trust and confidence, in Latin America's largest democracy.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference138 articles.
1. Jornal do Brasil (Brasília). 2000e. Caso de justiça. April 27.
2. Jornal do Brasil (Brasília). 2000a. Polícia procura donos da Incal. March 1.
3. Jornal do Brasil (Brasília). 1999f. Juiz reaparece e jura inocência. April 23.
4. Isto É. 1999d. O novelo de Nicolau. June 9: 39.
5. Jornal do Brasil (Brasília). 1999e. Guarda aberta. April 23.
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献