Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type

Author:

Blume‐Werry Gesche12ORCID,Dorrepaal Ellen2ORCID,Keuper Frida3ORCID,Kummu Matti4ORCID,Wild Birgit56ORCID,Weedon James T.7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Experimental Plant Ecology, Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology Greifswald University 17487 Greifswald Germany

2. Climate Impacts Research Centre, Department of Ecology and Environmental Science Umeå University 981 07 Abisko Sweden

3. BioEcoAgro Joint Research Unit INRAE F‐02000  Barenton‐Bugny France

4. Water and Development Research Group Aalto University 00076 Aalto Finland

5. Department of Environmental Science Stockholm University 114 18 Stockholm Sweden

6. Bolin Centre for Climate Research Stockholm University 114 18 Stockholm Sweden

7. Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment (A‐LIFE), Systems Ecology Section Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam 1081 Amsterdam the Netherlands

Abstract

Summary The distribution of roots throughout the soil drives depth‐dependent plant–soil interactions and ecosystem processes, particularly in arctic tundra where plant biomass, is predominantly belowground. Vegetation is usually classified from aboveground, but it is unclear whether such classifications are suitable to estimate belowground attributes and their consequences, such as rooting depth distribution and its influence on carbon cycling. We performed a meta‐analysis of 55 published arctic rooting depth profiles, testing for differences both between distributions based on aboveground vegetation types (Graminoid, Wetland, Erect‐shrub, and Prostrate‐shrub tundra) and between ‘Root Profile Types’ for which we defined three representative and contrasting clusters. We further analyzed potential impacts of these different rooting depth distributions on rhizosphere priming‐induced carbon losses from tundra soils. Rooting depth distribution hardly differed between aboveground vegetation types but varied between Root Profile Types. Accordingly, modelled priming‐induced carbon emissions were similar between aboveground vegetation types when they were applied to the entire tundra, but ranged from 7.2 to 17.6 Pg C cumulative emissions until 2100 between individual Root Profile Types. Variations in rooting depth distribution are important for the circumpolar tundra carbon‐climate feedback but can currently not be inferred adequately from aboveground vegetation type classifications.

Funder

H2020 European Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Plant Science,Physiology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3