Affiliation:
1. Department of Prosthodontics Faculty of Dentistry Suleyman Demirel University Isparta Turkey
2. Department of Prosthodontics Faculty of Dentistry Dokuz Eylul University Izmir Turkey
Abstract
AbstractPurposeTo evaluate the retention force of a novel conometric system after thermomechanical aging. In addition, the conometric system's retention force was compared with that of the cemented implant‐retained crowns.Materials and methodsTwo systems to retain implant crowns were tested in this study: a conometric system and a cement‐retained system. Forty‐eight zirconia crowns were fabricated using computer‐aided design and computer‐aided manufacturing technology. Twenty‐four zirconia crowns were cemented onto conometric caps with resin‐modified glass ionomer cement, which were then connected with abutments. These specimens were divided into three groups, and each group was subjected to the pull‐out test. A‐control group: 12 specimens directly subjected to pull‐out test; A‐aged group: 12 specimens subjected to thermomechanical aging followed by pull‐out test; A‐repeat group: After the pull‐out, the specimens in the aging group (A‐aged) were reconnected, and the pull‐out test was repeated once more. The remaining 24 zirconia crowns were cemented on standard abutments with zinc phosphate cement, and two groups were formed. C‐control group: 12 specimens directly subjected to the pull‐out test; C‐aged group: 12 specimens subjected to thermomechanical aging followed by pull‐out. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to evaluate the surfaces of caps and abutments. To analyze the data, repeated measures, one‐way ANOVA, and Bonferroni tests were used (p < 0.05).ResultsThe mean retention force value of the A‐control group was 148.22 ± 16.37 N. The highest mean retention force value was measured in the A‐aged group (204.93 ± 51.67 N), and the lowest mean retention force value was seen in the A‐repeated group (77.02 ± 21.48 N). Thermomechanical aging had a significant influence (p < 0.05) on both systems. No significant differences in retention force were found between the thermomechanical aged groups of both systems (p > 0.05). SEM analysis revealed that aging had an impact on the surface of the conometric system's caps and abutments.ConclusionsThe retention force of the conometric system increased significantly following thermomechanical aging. No crown separation occurred during the thermomechanical aging of the conometric system. There was no significant difference in the retention of the conometric and cemented systems after thermomechanical aging.
Reference39 articles.
1. Prosthetic complications in fixed endosseous implant-borne reconstructions after an observations period of at least 40 months
2. To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working Group 4 materials: cementation;Edelhoff D;Clin Oral Implants Res,2008
3. Clinical application of a shape memory implant abutment system
4. Clinical effectiveness of implant‐supported single‐tooth replacement: the Toronto Study;Avivi‐Arber L;Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,1996
5. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献