Marginal and internal fit of five‐unit zirconia‐based fixed dental prostheses fabricated with digital scans and conventional impressions: A comparative in vitro study

Author:

Bandiaky Octave Nadile1ORCID,Clouet Roselyne2,Le Bars Pierre2,Soueidan Assem3,Le Guehennec Laurent4

Affiliation:

1. Nantes University, Oniris, Univ Angers, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton Nantes France

2. Department of Prosthetic Dentistry Nantes University, CHU Nantes Nantes France

3. Department of Periodontology Nantes University, Oniris, Univ Angers, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton Nantes France

4. Department of Prosthodontics Nantes University, Oniris, Univ Angers, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton Nantes France

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThis study aimed to compare the marginal and internal fit of five‐unit zirconia‐based fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fabricated using digital scans and conventional impressions.Materials and methodsNine master models with three zirconia abutments were scanned with an intraoral scanner (test group), and nine conventional impressions (control group) of these same models were also made. The stone casts from these impressions were scanned with a laboratory extraoral scanner (D700, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). A total of 18 five‐unit zirconia‐based FDP frameworks (test group, n = 9; control group, n = 9) were manufactured. Marginal and internal fit (in μm) were evaluated using the replica method under micro‐computed tomography. Analysis of variance (one‐way ANOVA) and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to compare continuous variables across two groups. A level of p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.ResultsThe mean ± standard deviation of the marginal fit was 95.03 ± 12.74 μm in the test group and 106.02 ± 14.51 μm in the control group. The lowest marginal mean value was observed in the test group, with a statistically significant difference compared to the control group (F = 14.56, p < 0.05). The mean ± standard deviation of the internal fit was 103.61 ± 9.32 and 106.38 ± 7.64 μm, respectively, in the test and control groups, with no statistically significant difference (F = 1.56, p > 0.05). The mean values of both groups were clinically acceptable.ConclusionsThe five‐unit zirconia‐based FDPs fabricated with digital scans showed better fit than those in the conventional impression group. Within the limitations of this study, these results are encouraging, and continued progress in the digital field should allow for more accurate long‐span restorations.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Dentistry

Reference73 articles.

1. Accuracy of intraoral scanners: a systematic review of influencing factors;Abduo J;Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent,2018

2. Periodontal tissue responses after insertion of artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures

3. Five‐year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures;Sailer I;Int J Prosthodont,2007

4. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs

5. Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3