Comparison of surface roughness of additively manufactured implant‐supported interim crowns fabricated with different print orientations

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo assess the influence of print orientation on the surface roughness of implant‐supported interim crowns manufactured by using digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing procedures.Materials and methodsAn implant‐supported maxillary right premolar full‐contour crown was obtained. The interim restoration design was used to fabricate 30 specimens with 3 print orientations (0, 45, and 90 degrees) using an interim resin material (GC Temp PRINT) and a DLP printer (Asiga MAX UV) (n = 10). The specimens were manufactured, and each was cemented to an implant abutment with autopolymerizing composite resin cement (Multilink Hybrid Abutment). Surface roughness was assessed on the buccal surface of the premolar specimen by using an optical measurement system (InfiniteFocusG5 plus). The data were analyzed with a Shapiro–Wilk test, resulting in a normal distribution. One‐way ANOVA and the Tukey HSD tests were selected (α = 0.05).ResultsStatistically significant discrepancies were found in the surface roughness mean values among the groups tested (p < 0.001). The lowest mean ± standard deviation surface roughness was found with the 90‐degree group (1.2 ± 0.36 μm), followed by the 0‐degree orientation (2.23 ± 0.18 μm) and the 45‐degree group (3.18 ± 0.31 μm).ConclusionsPrint orientation parameter significantly impacted the surface roughness of the implant‐supported interim crowns manufactured by using the additive procedures tested.