1. A first pass, using pre‐history and contemporary history, at understanding why Australia and England have such different policies towards electronic nicotine delivery systems, 1970s–
c
. 2018
2. ChapmanS. DaubeM. PetersM.Public submission to the Senate Select Committee on Tobacco Harm Reduction. Submission 195. Parliament of Australia.2020. Available at:https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Tobacco_Harm_Reduction/TobaccoHarmReduction/Submissions(accessed 25 January 2021).
3. ChapmanS. DaubeM. BarehamD. PetersM.Public submission to the Inquiry into the use and marketing of electronic cigarettes and personal vaporisers in Australia. Submission 313. Parliament of Australia.2017. Available at:https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House/Health_Aged_Care_and_Sport/ElectronicCigarettes/Submissions(accessed 12 February 2021).
4. GlantzS.Who forced the cigarette companies to run those anti‐smoking ads? The Conversation.2017. Available at:https://theconversation.com/who‐forced‐the‐cigarette‐companies‐to‐run‐those‐anti‐smoking‐ads‐89347(accessed 16 February 2021).
5. Civil disobedience and tobacco control: the case of BUGA UP. Billboard Utilising Graffitists Against Unhealthy Promotions