Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of invasive melanoma: A systematic review with meta‐analyses

Author:

Williams G. J.12,Quinn T.3,Lo S.12ORCID,Guitera P.124,Scolyer R. A.12456,Thompson J. F.12478ORCID,Ch'ng S.1247ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Melanoma Institute Australia The University of Sydney North Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

3. The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne Australia

4. Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia

5. NSW Health Pathology Sydney New South Wales Australia

6. Charles Perkins Centre The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

7. Mater Hospital, North Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

8. Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences The University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe use of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) in melanoma treatment has divided opinion and evidence‐based guidelines are lacking.ObjectivesThis systematic review aimed to analyse clinical outcomes for patients with invasive melanomas treated with Mohs rather than wide local excision (WLE).MethodsEmbase, MEDLINE and Cochrane databases (to 30 August 2023) were searched for studies using Mohs to treat invasive melanoma. Outcomes of interest were local recurrence and death from melanoma.ResultsThirty‐five articles involving 41,499 patients with invasive melanoma treated with Mohs were identified. Sixteen studies compared Mohs with WLE and 19 were Mohs‐only, non‐comparative studies. Patients treated with Mohs differed significantly from those undergoing WLE, in particular Mohs patients were older and had thinner melanomas. Two comparative studies using the same data source reported adjusted hazard ratios for melanoma‐specific death and both showed no significant difference between Mohs and WLE‐treated patients; 0.87 (95% CI 0.55–1.35) and 1.20 (95% CI 0.71–20.36). There was also no statistically significant difference in local recurrence risk; the unadjusted risk ratio for patients treated with Mohs was 0.46 (95% CI 0.14–1.51 p = 0.20) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 62%). No studies reported multivariable analyses for risk of local recurrence. Many studies generated from relatively few and often overlapping data sets have reported the use of Mohs to treat patients with invasive melanoma. Fewer studies were comparative between Mohs and WLE and these reported substantially different baseline risks of recurrence and death from melanoma between the groups. Mohs has generally been used for thinner melanomas in older patients; therefore, comparisons based on univariable analyses are likely to have been misleading.ConclusionsOn the basis of currently available data, it is not possible to reliably assess whether outcomes differ if invasive melanomas with comparable features are treated with Mohs or WLE, and randomized trial evidence will be required for reliable conclusions to be reached.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3