Child protection contact among children of culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds: A South Australian linked data study

Author:

Abdul Rahim Razlyn1ORCID,Pilkington Rhiannon12,Procter Alexandra M12ORCID,Montgomerie Alicia12,Mittinty Murthy N1,D'Onise Katina13,Lynch John124

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Health The University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia

2. Robinson Research Institute The University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia

3. Prevention and Population Health Wellbeing SA Adelaide South Australia Australia

4. Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK

Abstract

AimTo describe the cumulative incidence of child protection (CP) system contact, maltreatment type, source of reports to age 7 years, and socio‐demographic characteristics for culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) Australian children.MethodsWe used CP, education, health, and birth registrations data for children followed from birth up to age 7 from the South Australian Better Evidence, Better Outcomes, Linked Data (SA BEBOLD) platform. Participants: SA born children enrolled in their first year of school from 2009 to 2015 (n = 76 563). CALD defined as non‐Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander, spoken language other than English, Indigenous or Sign, or had at least one parent born in a non‐English speaking country. Outcomes measures: For CALD and non‐CALD children, we estimated the cumulative incidence (risk) of CP contacts up to age 7, relative risk and risk differences for all levels of CP contact from notification to out‐of‐home care (OOHC), primary maltreatment type, reporter type, and socio‐economic characteristics. Sensitivity analyses explored different population selection criteria and CALD definitions.ResultsBy age 7, 11.2% of CALD children had ‘screened‐in’ notifications compared to 18.8% of non‐CALD (risk difference [RD] 7.6 percentage points (95% confidence interval: 6.9–8.3)), and 0.6% of CALD children experienced OOHC compared to 2.2% of non‐CALD (RD 1.6 percentage points (95% confidence interval: 1.3–1.8)). Emotional abuse was the most common substantiated maltreatment type for CALD and neglect for non‐CALD. Among both groups, the most common reporter sources were police and education sector. Socio‐economic characteristics were broadly similar. Sensitivity analyses results were consistent with primary analyses.ConclusionBy age 7, CALD children had lower risk of contact with all levels of CP. Estimates based on primary and sensitivity analyses suggested CALD children were 5–9 percentage points less likely to have a report screened‐in, and from 1.0 to 1.7 percentage points less likely to have experienced OOHC.

Funder

Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia

National Health and Medical Research Council

Westpac Scholars Trust

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference41 articles.

1. Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries

2. A public health approach to preventing child maltreatment: An intelligent information infrastructure to help us know what works

3. The Successes and Limitations of Contemporary Approaches to Child Protection

4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.Child protection Australia 2020–21. AIHW; 2022. Report No: CWS 87.

5. PilkingtonR GrantJ ChittleboroughC GialamasA MontgomerieA LynchJ.Child Protection in South Australia. The University of Adelaide BetterStart Child Health and Development Research Group School of Public Health;2017.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3