Nurse‐sensitive quality and benchmarking in hospitals striving for Magnet® or Pathway® designation: A qualitative study

Author:

Maier Claudia B.1ORCID,Gurisch Carolin2ORCID,Köppen Julia13ORCID,Kleine Joan3ORCID,Aiken Linda H.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Health Bielefeld University Bielefeld Germany

2. Department of Health Sciences BQS Institut für Qualität Und Patientensicherheit GmbH Hamburg Germany

3. Department of Healthcare Management Technische Universität Berlin Berlin Germany

4. School of Nursing, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia USA

Abstract

AbstractAimTo examine if and how selected German hospitals use nurse‐sensitive clinical indicators and perspectives on national/international benchmarking.DesignQualitative study.MethodsIn 2020, 18 expert interviews were conducted with key informants from five purposively selected hospitals, being the first in Germany implementing Magnet® or Pathway®. Interviews were analyzed using content analysis with deductive‐inductive coding. The study followed the COREQ guideline.ResultsThree major themes emerged: first, limited pre‐existence of and necessity for nurse‐sensitive data. Although most interviewees reported data collection for hospital‐acquired pressure ulcers and falls with injuries, implementation varied and interviewees highlighted the necessity to develop additional nurse‐sensitive indicators for the German context. Second, the theme creating an enabling data environment comprised building clinicians' acceptance, establishing a data culture, and reducing workload by using electronic health records. Third, challenges and opportunities in establishing benchmarking were identified but most interviewees called for a national or European benchmarking system.ConclusionThe need for further development of nurse‐sensitive clinical indicators and its implementation in practice was highlighted. Several actions were suggested at hospital level to establish an enabling data environment in clinical care, including a nationwide or European benchmarking system.Implications for the Profession and Patient CareInvolving nurses in data collection, comparison and benchmarking of nurse‐sensitive indicators and their use in practice can improve quality of patient care.ImpactNurse‐sensitive indicators were rarely collected, and a need for action was identified. The study results show research needs on nurse‐sensitive indicators for Germany and Europe. Measures were identified to create an enabling data environment in hospitals. An initiative was started in Germany to establish a nurse‐sensitive benchmarking capacity.Patient or Public ContributionClinical practitioners and nurse/clinical managers were interviewed.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference45 articles.

1. Nursing-sensitive indicators: a concept analysis

2. American Nurses Association. (2023).Nursing Quality.https://www.nursingworld.org/practice‐policy/health‐policy/health‐system‐reform/quality/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3