Factors associated with frequent emergency department visits among health centre patients receiving primary care

Author:

Pourat Nadereh12,Lu Connie1ORCID,Chen Xiao1,Zhou Weihao1,Hair Brionna3,Bolton Joshua3ORCID,Hoang Hank3,Sripipatana Alek3

Affiliation:

1. UCLA Center for Health Policy Research Los Angeles California USA

2. UCLA Fielding School of Public Health Department of Health Policy and Management Los Angeles California USA

3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Quality Improvement, Bureau of Primary Health Care Health Resources and Services Administration Rockville Maryland USA

Abstract

AbstractRationale, Aims and ObjectivesWe sought to examine specific care‐seeking behaviours and experiences, access indicators, and patient care management approaches associated with frequency of emergency department (ED) visits among patients of Health Resources and Services Administration‐funded health centres that provide comprehensive primary care to low‐income and uninsured patients.MethodWe used cross‐sectional data of a most recent nationally representative sample of health centre adult patients aged 18–64 (n = 4577) conducted between October 2014 and April 2015. These data were merged with the 2014 Uniform Data System to incorporate health centre characteristics. We measured care‐seeking behaviours by whether the patient called the health centre afterhours, for an urgent appointment, or talked to a provider about a concern. Access to care indicators included health centre continuity of care and receipt of transportation or translation services. We included receipt of care coordination and specialist referral as care management indicators. We used a multilevel multinomial logistic regression model to identify the association of independent variables with number of ED visits (4 or more visits, 2–3 visits, 1 visit, vs. 0 visits), controlling for predisposing, enabling, and need characteristics.ResultsCalling the health centre after‐hours (OR = 2.41) or for urgent care (OR = 2.53), and being referred to specialists (OR = 2.36) were associated with higher odds of four or more ED visits versus none. Three or more years of continuity with the health centre (OR = 0.32) was also associated with lower odds of four or more ED visits versus none.ConclusionsFindings underscore opportunities to reduce higher frequency of ED visits in health centres, which are primary care providers to many low‐income populations. Our findings highlight the potential importance of improving patient retention, better access to providers afterhours or for urgent visits, and access to specialist as areas of care in need of improvement.

Funder

Health Resources and Services Administration

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference52 articles.

1. CohenSB UberoiN. Differentials in the concentration in the level of health expenditures across population subgroups in the U.S. 2010 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). Statistical Brief (Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (US)). 2001.

2. Characteristics of Frequent Users of Emergency Departments

3. Many Emergency Department Visits Could Be Managed At Urgent Care Centers And Retail Clinics

4. CastellucciM. Unnecessary ED visits from chronically ill patients cost $8.3 billion. February 2019. Accessed December 9 2019. https://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20190207/TRANSFORMATION03/190209949/unnecessary-ed-visits-from-chronically-ill-patients-cost-8-3-billion.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3