Affiliation:
1. Institute of Archaeology University College London 31‐34 Gordon Square London WC1H 0PY United Kingdom
Abstract
SummaryThe traces of marks left by human bodies on surviving archaeological artefacts can be a rich and informative source for understanding everyday individuals and their practices in the past. Nevertheless, such traces have tended to be neglected or generalized in archaeology, in favour of elite artefacts and manufacturing statistics – or in pursuit of ‘clean’, forensically amenable evidence, e.g. dry fingerprints. Using two case studies from Bronze Age Crete, this paper calls for an attitudinal, as much as a methodological, shift in how we exploit the remnants of gestural preferences, limitations and mistakes which we have hitherto chosen to dismiss. I argue that, if we want to understand nameless individuals of past societies, we need to overcome our implicit aversion to the mundane and everyday and to find new ways of exploring the ‘messy’, inconvenient, but also abundant fleeting moments of bodies no longer extant.
Reference37 articles.
1. Dusting the past: archaeology and ancient fingerprints;Arp D.;Journal of Forensic Identification,2002
2. Studying fingerprints in archaeology: potentials and limitations of paleodermatoglyphics as an archaeometric method;Arslan A.;Turkish Journal of Archaeological Sciences,2023
3. Åström P.andEriksson S.A.1980:Fingerprints and Archaeology(Göteborg).
4. Tracking the division of labour through handprints: Applying Reflectance Transformation Imaging (RTI) to clay 'tokens’ in Neolithic West Asia
5. Fingerprints on Early Minoan pottery: a pilot study;Branigan K.;BSA,2002