Suicide decision‐making: Differences in proximal considerations between individuals who aborted and attempted suicide

Author:

Xu Irene1ORCID,Millner Alexander J.23ORCID,Fortgang Rebecca G.24,Nock Matthew K.243

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin USA

2. Department of Psychology Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts USA

3. Department of Psychiatry Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

4. Mental Health Research Franciscan Children's Brighton Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThe transition from suicidal thoughts to behaviors often involves considering the consequences of suicide as part of the decision‐making process. This study explored the relationship between this consideration process and the decision to either abort or carry out a suicide attempt.MethodsAmong inpatients with a suicide‐related event in the past 2 weeks (suicide attempt n = 30 or aborted attempt n = 16), we assessed the degree to which they considered six domains of consequences, the impact of these considerations on their inclination to attempt suicide, and the duration of their decision‐making.ResultsAll the participants who aborted and 87% of those who attempted considered consequences of suicide. Participants who aborted took longer to progress through decision‐making stages and considered more suicide‐hindering factors, especially interpersonal ones, though these differences were no longer significant after correction. Group status moderated the relationship between the balance of suicide‐facilitating and suicide‐hindering considerations and decision‐making duration. Considering the consequences of suicide more favorably was related to a shorter ideation‐to‐action period before a suicide attempt and a longer ideation period before aborting an attempt.ConclusionThis study highlights the complexity of suicide decision‐making and its role in better understanding the progression from ideation to action.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3