Examining the predictive utility of suicidal ideation characteristics in relation to real‐time monitoring of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts at follow‐up

Author:

Rogers Megan L.1ORCID,Bozzay Melanie L.2,Hughes Christopher D.34,Schatten Heather T.34ORCID,Armey Michael F.34

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology Texas State University San Marcos Texas USA

2. The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio USA

3. Butler Hospital Providence Rhode Island USA

4. Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence Rhode Island USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionSeveral characteristics of suicidal ideation, including frequency, duration, perceived controllability, and intensity, have been identified. The present study examined whether these characteristics of baseline suicidal ideation uniquely predicted (1) the severity, variability, and frequency of suicidal ideation assessed through real‐time monitoring; and (2) suicide attempts at 3‐week and 6‐month follow‐up among recently discharged psychiatric inpatients.MethodsA sample of 249 adults (Mage = 40.43, 55.1% female, 91.4% White) completed a baseline assessment of their suicidal ideation characteristics during psychiatric hospitalization, five daily ecological momentary assessments (EMA) for 21 days following discharge, and follow‐up assessments of suicide‐related outcomes at 3‐week and 6‐month follow‐up.ResultsPerceived controllability of suicidal thoughts was uniquely associated with the variability of EMA‐assessed suicidal ideation and the presence of suicide attempts at 3‐week, but not 6‐month follow‐up. No other characteristic of baseline suicidal ideation was uniquely associated with EMA‐assessed suicidal ideation or the presence of suicide attempts at follow‐up.ConclusionsGiven links between the perceived controllability of suicidal ideation and (1) momentary variability of suicidal ideation and (2) suicide attempts over the subsequent 3 weeks, perceived controllability of suicidal thinking may be a useful marker of short‐term risk that may be malleable to clinical intervention.

Funder

National Institute of Mental Health

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3