Factors influencing clinician decision‐making about POLST use with nursing facility residents: A qualitative study

Author:

Cole Connie S.123ORCID,Lum Hillary D.2ORCID,Hickman Susan E.1345ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Indiana University School of Nursing Indianapolis Indiana USA

2. University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora Colorado USA

3. RESPECT (Research in Palliative and End‐of‐Life Communication and Training) Signature Center Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Indianapolis Indiana USA

4. IU Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute Indianapolis Indiana USA

5. Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundNational POLST guidance indicates POLST is intended for individuals at risk of life‐threatening clinical events due to serious illness. Even though this patient population includes many, but not all, nursing facility residents, there is evidence that POLST is used broadly in this setting. This study aimed to identify clinician perspectives regarding factors that influence their decision‐making about whether to use POLST with nursing facility residents and to distinguish between inappropriate and appropriate use.MethodsWe conducted a descriptive qualitative study to explore the experience of nursing facility clinicians using POLST with residents and deciding who is appropriate and inappropriate for POLST. Participants were purposively sampled from multiple states using POLST. Interviews were audio‐recorded and professionally transcribed. We used rapid qualitative analysis to code data and identify themes.ResultsWe interviewed 28 clinicians from 14 states about how they decided whether to use POLST with nursing facility residents and to distinguish between inappropriate and appropriate use. For themes emerged as factors driving clinician‐decision‐making POLST use: (1) belief that “everyone is appropriate”; (2) resident and family preferences; (3) resident health status; and (4) policies requiring POLST. In most cases, participants cited resident and family preferences for treatment limitations as well as prognosis and clinical assessments in determining when POLST use was appropriate. Factors influencing potentially inappropriate POLST use included nursing facility policies requiring POLST completion that preempted clinical judgments of appropriateness.ConclusionsFindings highlight the disconnect between National POLST guidance and current use of POLST in nursing facilities. Policies requiring POLST use in nursing facilities and the belief that “everyone is appropriate” may impede clinician autonomy and lead to potentially inappropriate POLST use. Given varying approaches to POLST use in nursing facilities, there is a need to refocus attention on the intended population for POLST.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology

Reference20 articles.

1. POLST: Portable medical orders for seriously ill or frail individuals.2021.https://polst.org/

2. Identifying the Population with Serious Illness: The “Denominator” Challenge

3. Risk communication in practice: the contribution of decision aids

4. Are patients accurate forecasters of their emotional response to medical conditions? A scoping review on affective forecasting

5. POLST N.Intended population & guidance for health care professionals.2019.https://polst.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/2019.01.14-POLST-Intended-Population.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3