Affiliation:
1. University of Maryland School of Medicine
2. Stanford University School of Medicine
3. The Queen's Health System
4. Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine
Abstract
AbstractThe Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) seeks to develop evidence‐based alternative payment models (APM) to improve health care quality and reduce costs, but its performance in achieving these goals has been mixed. In October 2021, CMMI released its Innovation Strategy Refresh to highlight challenges faced by payment models and suggest new strategic approaches for the upcoming decade. While a welcome recast of organizational goals, the Refresh leaves space for how CMMI will address persistent issues. These include how CMMI can best engage physicians and patients in APMs, minimize conflicting incentives among APMs, reduce selection bias in model participation, and, ultimately, transition away from the fee‐for‐service framework that underlies much of Medicare reimbursement. This article provides guidance to CMMI's vision by examining challenges within CMMI's strategy for model building and offering solutions to mitigate these issues. These strategies include engaging beneficiaries in APM incentives, expanding operational flexibility to improve clinical behaviors (e.g., waivers), rectifying issues with conflicting model incentives, building voluntary short‐term and mandatory long‐term incentives to mitigate selection bias, and transitioning to an overriding population‐based model to constrain net costs.
Policy Points
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) seeks to develop evidence‐based alternative payment models (APM) to improve care quality and reduce health care cost, but its performance in achieving these goals has been mixed.
In October 2021, CMMI released a “strategic refresh” of its goals but left space for how persistent issues to model development would be addressed.
We propose strategies to engage physicians and patients in APMs, minimize conflicting incentives among APMs, reduce selection bias in model participation, and, ultimately, transition away from the fee‐for‐service framework that underlies much of Medicare reimbursement.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference21 articles.
1. Innovation Center Strategy Refresh. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 2021.https://innovation.cms.gov/strategic‐direction‐whitepaper
2. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Pub L No. 111‐148 124 Stat 119 (2010). Accessed February 16 2022.https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/PLAW‐111publ148
3. Streamlining CMS's portfolio of alternative payment models. In:June 2021 Report to the Congress: Medicare and the Health Care Delivery System.Medicare Payment Advisory Commission; 2021:41‐67. Accessed January 30 2022.https://www.medpac.gov/document/june‐2021‐report‐to‐the‐congress‐medicare‐and‐the‐health‐care‐delivery‐system/
4. June 2020 Report to the Congress: Medicare and the Health Care Delivery System.Medicare Payment Advisory Commission; 2020:5. Accessed March 6 2022.https://www.medpac.gov/document/june‐2020‐report‐to‐the‐congress‐medicare‐and‐the‐health‐care‐delivery/
5. Government As Innovation Catalyst: Lessons From The Early Center For Medicare And Medicaid Innovation Models