Critical analysis of the reporting quality of case reports focusing on dental traumatology using the Preferred Reporting Items for Case reports in Endodontics 2020 checklist: A baseline evaluation prior to checklist publication

Author:

Nagendrababu Venkateshbabu1ORCID,Sarao Simran Kaur2,Berlin‐Broner Yuli3ORCID,Gopinath Vellore Kannan1ORCID,Shetty Naresh Yedthare45ORCID,Duncan Henry F.6ORCID,Abbott Paul V.7ORCID,Dummer Paul M. H.8ORCID,Levin Liran3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Sharjah, College of Dental Medicine, Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry Sharjah UAE

2. College of Dentistry Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA

3. Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry University of Alberta Alberta Edmonton Canada

4. Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Dentistry Ajman University Ajman UAE

5. Centre of Medical and Biomedical Allied Health Sciences Research Deanship of Graduate Studies and Research Ajman UAE

6. Division of Restorative Dentistry Dublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College Dublin Dublin Ireland

7. UWA Dental School The University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia

8. School of Dentistry, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences Cardiff University Cardiff UK

Abstract

AbstractBackground/AimsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Case Reports in Endodontics (PRICE) 2020 guidelines were published to help authors produce high‐quality case reports. The aim of this study was to use the PRICE 2020 guidelines to appraise a sample of 50 case reports related to dental traumatology that were published before the guidelines were available in order to assess various parameters influencing the reporting quality.MethodsFifty case reports published between 2015 and 2019 and related to dental traumatology were randomly selected from the PubMed database. Reports were assessed by two independent evaluators using the PRICE checklist. Each item received a score of “1” if the manuscript met all pertinent criteria, “0” if it was not reported, and “0.5” if it was reported insufficiently. “Not Applicable” (NA) was assigned to items that were irrelevant to a specific report. The estimated total PRICE score for each case report was computed by adding all the scores, with a maximum score of 47 minus any “NA” scores. Descriptive and Inferential statistics (Student's t‐test and ANOVA) were used for analysis.ResultsThe percentage of case reports that fully met each applicable criteria ranged from 0% to 100%. The percentage of case reports partially satisfying each applicable criterion varied from 0% to 88%. There was a significant difference in scores for case reports published in journals with an impact factor compared with those without (p = .042). No significant difference was observed between the mean scores that compared the period of publication. There was no significant difference between journals that followed the CARE guidelines and those that did not.ConclusionSeveral items within the PRICE 2020 guidelines were either not reported or only partially reported in case reports related to dental traumatology prior to the checklist publication. It is recommended that authors follow the PRICE 2020 guidelines to improve the overall quality of their case reports.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Oral Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3