Public views on healthcare workers' burnout before and during COVID‐19: A comparative study

Author:

Kagan Ilya1ORCID,Tsamir Judith2,Engelchin Nissan Esti3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Nursing Department Ashkelon Academic College Ashkelon Israel

2. The Israel Academic College in Ramat Gan Ramat Gan Israel

3. Head, The Bachelor's Degree Program in Economics The Israel Academic College in Ramat Gan Ramat Gan Israel

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionUnderstanding burnout among nurses and physicians may mobilize public support for increasing budgets, personnel, and trust in both routine and pandemic times. The study aimed to examine public views of nurse and physician burnout both before and 1 year after the COVID‐19 outbreak.DesignThis study was conducted in two phases in a pre‐post design.MethodsThe general public (a random sample) responded to a structured questionnaire with 1–2 open‐ended questions: (a) before the COVID‐19 pandemic, in 2019 during routine life (n = 504) and (b) 1 year after the COVID‐19 outbreak, in 2021 (n = 500). Quantitative and qualitative data on public perceptions of nurse and physician burnout, its sources and consequences, were collected.ResultsThe public view was that hospital physicians and even more so hospital nurses suffer from higher burnout than those working in the community, and that this worsened during the pandemic. Three themes related to caregiver burnout were identified: (a) work overload, (b) lack of sensitivity, empathy, and motivation, and (c) impaired ability to provide quality care.ConclusionsThe public is aware of the experiences of caregivers both in times of routine and in emergency. Healthcare management must influence public opinion in order to receive support for organizational steps.Clinical RelevanceHealthcare leaders should leverage public support in order to receive backing for organizational moves aimed at improving work conditions and, in turn, the quality of care and patient outcomes.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Nursing

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Yes but No: Media Frames for Denying Nurses’ Strikes during COVID-19 Recovery;Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3