The influence of metal artifact reduction on the trueness of registration of a cone‐beam computed tomography scan with an intraoral scan in the presence of severe restoration artifact

Abstract

AbstractPurposeWhen planning guided implant surgery, highly radiopaque materials such as metals or zirconia produce streaking artifacts (‘metal artifact’) on cone‐beam computed tomography scans, which can impair registration of the intraoral scan. This study aimed to determine the effect of metal artifact reduction on the trueness of registration in the presence of multiple full‐coverage zirconia crowns.Materials and methodsA 3D‐printed maxillary study model was restored with 12 full‐coverage zirconia crowns and scanned with an intraoral scanner. Cone‐beam computed tomography scans of the study model were acquired, with and without activation of the metal artifact reduction algorithm. Registration of the optical scans was performed using initial point‐based registration with surface‐based refinement, and the deviation was measured at four pre‐defined dental landmarks. Welch's t‐test was used to compare the registration error for the metal artifact reduction group with the control group.ResultsThe average registration error was 0.519 mm (95% CI 0.507 to 0.531) with metal artifact reduction deactivated, compared to 0.478 mm (95% CI 0.460 to 0.496) without metal artifact reduction. Therefore, activation of the metal artifact reduction algorithm was associated with a 0.041 mm (95% CI 0.020 to 0.061, p < 0.001) increase in average registration error.ConclusionsThe use of the metal artifact reduction algorithm slightly reduced trueness in this in vitro study. Clinicians are advised not to rely on a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm for registration of a cone‐beam computed tomography scan with an intraoral scan when planning guided implant surgery in the presence of restoration artifacts.