Restoring Children From Out‐of‐Home Care: Insights From an Aboriginal‐Led Community Forum

Author:

Newton B. J.1ORCID,Gray Paul2,Cripps Kyllie3,Falster Kathleen4,Katz Ilan5,Chiswell Kimberly5,Wellington Lisa6,Ardler Richard7,Frith Fiona8,Jones Tori7,Kent Mandy8,Tong Neika5

Affiliation:

1. Scientia Senior Research Fellow UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia

2. Jumbunna Institute for Indigenous Education and Research University of Technology Sydney Ultimo Australia

3. Monash Indigenous Studies Centre Monash University Melbourne Australia

4. Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Population Health UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia

5. Social Policy Research Centre UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia

6. Waminda South Coast Women's Health and Wellbeing Aboriginal Corporation Nowra Australia

7. South Coast Medical Service Aboriginal Corporation Nowra Australia

8. Illawarra Aboriginal Corporation Wollongong Australia

Abstract

ABSTRACTRestoring children from out‐of‐home care (OOHC) to their families is the preferred outcome for all children removed by child protection services, yet little is known about how restoration processes are experienced by families and services supporting them. This paper provides important insights about Aboriginal child restoration from 40 practitioners and stakeholders at a community forum led by Aboriginal Community Controlled Organisations in regional New South Wales (NSW), Australia. This is one component of larger Aboriginal‐led research, which investigates child protection experiences and pathways to successful restoration in NSW and the data source for this paper. The community forum explored the issues for families navigating family preservation, OOHC and restoration within child protection and legal systems. Findings include the need for a continuum of support for families throughout their engagement with child protection systems and crucially following the removal of their children. Barriers to effective restoration practice included a lack of access to meaningful and ongoing preservation services, insufficient cultural care planning and family finding efforts that are often too late, the pressure on services to support families without adequate capabilities or enough resourcing, the lack of transparency and the complexities in navigating the restoration process, and the lack of culturally informed support for children and their families while children are in care. Implications for policy and practice are discussed. This paper contributes to understanding practice, processes and barriers for restoration, particularly focused on the perspectives of Aboriginal families and communities, with potential insights for practice within Australia and internationally.

Funder

Australian Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Reference29 articles.

1. AbSec.2020. “Aboriginal Family Preservation and Restoration Model Guidelines.” June 2020 Sydney.

2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS).2022. “Data by region ” accessed July 9 2023.https://dbr.abs.gov.au/.

3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW).2023. “Supplementary data table S5.10 ” accessed July 9 2023.

4. A Participatory Approach to Social Impact Assessment: The Interactive Community Forum;Becker D. R.;Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3