Research Review: Psychological and psychosocial interventions for children and adolescents with depression, anxiety, and post‐traumatic stress disorder in low‐ and middle‐income countries – a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Alozkan‐Sever Cansu1ORCID,Uppendahl Jana R.2,Cuijpers Pim1,de Vries Ralph3,Rahman Atif4,Mittendorfer‐Rutz Ellenor5,Akhtar Aemal5,Zheng Zhuoli6,Sijbrandij Marit1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical, Neuro‐ and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

2. Chair of Social Pediatrics, TUM School of Medicine Technical University of Munich Munich Germany

3. Medical Library Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

4. Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health University of Liverpool Liverpool UK

5. Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

6. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

Abstract

BackgroundThe incidence of depression, anxiety, and post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among children and adolescents residing in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) poses a significant public health concern. However, there is variation in the evidence of effective psychological interventions. This meta‐analysis aims to provide a complete overview of the current body of evidence in this rapidly evolving field.MethodsWe conducted searches on PubMed, Embase.com, and EBSCO/APA PsycInfo databases up to June 23, 2022, identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness of psychological interventions in LMICs that targeted children and adolescents with elevated symptoms above a cut‐off score for depression, anxiety, and PTSD, comparing a psychological or psychosocial intervention with other control conditions. We conducted random effects meta‐analyses for depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms. Sensitivity analysis for outliers and high‐risk studies, and analyses for the publication bias were carried out. Subgroup analyses investigated how the intervention type, intervention format, the facilitator, study design, and age group of the participant predicted effect sizes.ResultsThirty‐one RCTs (6,123 participants) were included. We found a moderate effect of interventions on depression outcomes compared to the control conditions (g = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.06–0.99; NNT = 6.09) with a broad prediction interval (PI) (−1.8 to 2.86). We found a moderate to large effect for interventions on anxiety outcomes (g = 0.88; 95% CI: −0.03 to 1.79; NNT = 3.32) with a broad PI (−3.14 to 4.9). Additionally, a moderate effect was observed on PTSD outcomes (g = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.19–0.9; NNT = 5.86) with a broad PI (−0.64 to 1.72).ConclusionsPsychological and psychosocial interventions aimed at addressing depression, anxiety, and PTSD among children and adolescents in LMICs have demonstrated promising results. However, future studies should consider the variation in evidence and incorporate long‐term outcomes to better understand the effectiveness of these interventions.

Funder

Vetenskapsrådet

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3