Significant increased bacterial contamination with endoscope overnight and weekend storage times

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimForced‐air drying (FAD) cabinets are recommended for storage of reprocessed endoscopes, but financial constraints prevent their universal application. The study aimed to determine bacterial contamination in flexible gastroscopes (FG) channels after storage, in a cabinet with filtered air and UV lights, but without FAD.MethodsEight FG in clinical use in an endoscopy service of a large Brazilian hospital were sampled: immediately “Time zero” (N = 50), 12 h “Time 1” (N = 25), and 60 h “Time 2” (N = 25) after reprocessing. Following a flush‐brush‐flush of channels, 40‐mL sterile water and 3 cm of the brush were collected. Each sample was divided, filtered onto two 0.22‐μm membranes, and incubated in media without or with disinfectant neutralizer. Automated method was used for identification and antibiotic resistance test of isolated bacteria.ResultsBacterial contamination in times “1” and “2” was 5.9 and 16.1 times greater than that of “Time zero,” respectively. Number of positive cultures in media with and without neutralizer was similar at times “1” and “2,” while media with neutralizer produced more positive cultures at “Time zero.” Most bacteria isolated at “Time 2” were Gram‐negative rods (52.3%) and showed resistance to one or more antibiotics (65%).ConclusionBacterial contamination was detected on reprocessed FG stored in non‐FAD cabinets overnight (12 h) and increased with longer storage time (60 h). The contamination source is likely to be bacteria in biofilm which multiply in the absence of FAD. Evidence‐based criteria should be available for storage time according to the cabinet available.