Periradicular surgery: A longitudinal registry study of 10‐year outcomes and factors predictive of post‐surgical extraction

Author:

de Almeida Fernando José Mota12ORCID,Dawson Victoria S.3ORCID,Kvist Thomas2ORCID,Frisk Fredrik245ORCID,Bjørndal Lars6ORCID,Isberg Per‐Erik7,Fransson Helena3ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Tandvårdens Kompetenscentrum, Norrbotten Public Dental Service Luleå Sweden

2. Department of Endodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

3. Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Odontology Malmö University Malmö Sweden

4. Department of Endodontology Institute for Postgraduate Dental Education Jönköping Sweden

5. School of Health and Welfare Jönköping University Jönköping Sweden

6. Department of Cariology and Endodontics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

7. Department of Statistics, Lund University School of Economics and Management Lund University Lund Sweden

Abstract

AbstractAimThis historical prospective cohort study of the adult population of Sweden is based on data from a national registry: the primary aim was to evaluate the long‐term survival of teeth after periradicular surgery. A secondary aim was to identify factors predictive of extraction within 10 years of registration of periradicular surgery.MethodologyThe cohort consisted of all individuals who had undergone periradicular surgery to treat apical periodontitis, as reported to the Swedish Social Insurance Agency (SSIA) in 2009. The cohort was followed until 31 December 2020. Subsequent registrations of extractions were collected for Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and survival tables. The patients' sex, age, dental service provider and tooth group were also retrieved from SSIA. Only one tooth per individual was included in the analyses. Multivariable regression analysis was used and p < .05 was considered statistically significant. The reporting guidelines STROBE and PROBE were followed.ResultsAfter data cleaning, and exclusion of 157 teeth, 5622 teeth/individuals remained for analysis. The mean age of the individuals at the time of the periradicular surgery was 60.5 years (range 20–97, standard deviation 13.31); 55% were women. At the end of the follow‐up, that is, up to 12 years, a total of 34.1% of the teeth had been reported as extracted. The multivariate logistic regression analysis, based on follow‐up data at 10 years after registration of the periradicular surgery, included 5548 teeth, of which 1461 (26.3%) had been extracted. Significant associations between the independent variables tooth group and dental care setting (both p < .001) and the dependent variable extraction were found. The highest odds ratio (OR) for extraction applied to tooth group: compared to maxillary incisors and canines, mandibular molars were at greatest risk of extraction (OR 2.429, confidence interval 1.975–2.987, p < .001).ConclusionsAfter periradicular surgery in predominantly elderly people in Sweden, approximately three‐quarters of the teeth are retained over a 10‐year period. The type of tooth is associated with extraction: mandibular molars are at greater risk of extraction than maxillary incisors and canines.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Dentistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3