Improved nursing home end‐stage renal disease patient participation in physical therapy with onsite, more frequent dialysis

Author:

Bellin Eran Y.1,Markis William T.2ORCID,Hellebrand Alice M.3,Busby Christine M.4,Wane Katy A.4,Jordan Camille R.5,Ledvina Jordan G.3,Kaplan Steven M.3,Metzroth Todd R.4,Williams Greg S.4,Nazir Arif5ORCID,Levin Nathan W.6,Kaufman Allen M.3

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Epidemiology & Population Health and Medicine Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx New York USA

2. WTM Consulting Passaic New Jersey USA

3. Dialyze Direct Neptune City New Jersey USA

4. Signature HealthCARE Louisville Kentucky USA

5. SHC Med Partners Louisville Kentucky USA

6. Internal Medicine Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine New York New York USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionFor end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients residing in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), the logistics and physical exhaustion of life‐saving hemodialysis therapy often conflict with rehabilitation goals. Integration of dialysis care with rehabilitation programs in a scalable and cost‐efficient manner has been a significant challenge. SNF‐resident ESRD patients receiving onsite, more frequent hemodialysis (MFD) have reported rapid post‐dialysis recovery. We examined whether such patients have improved Physical Therapy (PT) participation.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective electronic medical records review of SNF‐resident PT participation rates within a multistate provider of SNF rehabilitation care from January 1, 2022 to June 1, 2022. We compared three groups: ESRD patients receiving onsite MFD (Onsite‐MFD), ESRD patients receiving offsite, conventional 3×/week dialysis (Offsite‐Conventional‐HD), and the general non‐ESRD SNF rehabilitation population (Non‐ESRD). We evaluated physical therapy participation rates based on a predefined metric of missed or shortened (<15 min) therapy days. Baseline demographics and functional status were assessed.FindingsNinety‐two Onsite‐MFD had 2084 PT sessions scheduled, 12,916 Non‐ESRD had 225,496 PT sessions scheduled, and 562 Offsite‐Conventional‐HD had 9082 PT sessions scheduled. In mixed model logistic regression, Onsite‐MFD achieved higher PT participation rates than Offsite‐Conventional‐HD (odds ratio: 1.8, CI: 1.1–3.0; p < 0.03), and Onsite‐MFD achieved equivalent PT participation rates to Non‐ESRD (odds ratio: 1.2, CI: 0.3–1.9; p < 0.46). Baseline mean ± SD Charlson Comorbidity score was significantly higher in Onsite‐MFD (4.9 ± 2.0) and Offsite‐Conventional‐HD (4.9 ± 1.8) versus Non‐ESRD (2.6 ± 2.0; p < 0.001). Baseline mean self‐care and mobility scores were significantly lower in Onsite‐MFD versus Non‐ESRD or Offsite‐Conventional‐HD.DiscussionSNF‐resident ESRD patients receiving MFD colocated with rehabilitation had higher PT participation rates than those conventionally dialyzed offsite and equivalent PT participation rates to the non‐ESRD SNF‐rehabilitation general population, despite being sicker, less independent, and less mobile. We report a scalable program integrating dialysis and rehabilitation care as a potential solution for ESRD patients recovering from acute hospitalization.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nephrology,Hematology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3