Medical Emergency Team call within 24 h of medical admission with a focus on sepsis: a retrospective review

Author:

Nolan James12ORCID,Mackay Ian1,Nolan Timothy34,de Looze Julian12

Affiliation:

1. Internal Medicine and Aged Care The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia

2. School of Medicine University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

3. The Cairns Hospital Cairns Queensland Australia

4. Griffith University Gold Coast Queensland Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimsClinical deterioration within the first 24 h of patient admission triggering a Medical Emergency Team (MET) call is a common occurrence. A greater understanding of these events, with a focus on the recognition and management of sepsis, could lead to quality improvement interventions.MethodsA retrospective observational review of general and subspecialty medical admissions triggering a MET call within 24 h of admission at a quaternary Australian hospital.Results2648 MET calls occurred (47.9/1000 admissions), 527 (20% of total MET events, 9.5/1000 admissions) within 24 h of admission, with the trigger more likely to be hypotension (odds ratio: 1.5, P = 0.0013). There were 263 MET calls to 217 individual medical patients within 24 h of admission, of which 84 (38.7%) were admitted with suspected infection, 69% of which fulfilled sepsis criteria. Of these, 36.2% received antimicrobial therapy within the recommended timeframe and 39.6% received antibiotics in line with hospital guidelines. Sepsis was initially missed in 11% of patients. Afferent limb failure occurred in 29% of patients with 40.5% experiencing a failure of the ward‐based response to deterioration prior to MET call. Median hospital length of stay was increased in patients admitted with suspected infection (7 vs 5 days, P = 0.015) and in those with sepsis not receiving antimicrobial therapy within guideline timeframes (9 vs 4 days, P = 0.017).ConclusionThere is a significant opportunity to improve care for patients who trigger a MET within 24 h of admission. This study supports the implementation of a hospital sepsis management guideline.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Internal Medicine

Reference42 articles.

1. Predicting clinical deterioration with Q‐ADDS compared to NEWS, between the flags, and eCART track and trigger tools;Campbell V;Resuscitation,2020

2. Comparison of policies for recognising and responding to clinical deterioration across five Victorian health services;Considine J;Aust Health Rev,2018

3. Impact of a standardized rapid response system on outcomes in a large healthcare jurisdiction;Chen J;Resuscitation,2016

4. Hospital outcomes associated with introduction of a two‐tiered response to the deteriorating patient;Frost SA;Crit Care Resusc,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3