Public stigma in intellectual disability: do direct versus indirect questions make a difference?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

登录注册会员服务联系我们

Public stigma in intellectual disability: do direct versus indirect questions make a difference?

Published:2015-06-03 Issue:10 Volume:59 Page:958-969
ISSN:0964-2633
Container-title:Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

Author:

Werner S.¹

Affiliation:

1. Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Jerusalem Israel

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Neurology (clinical),Neurology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Rehabilitation

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/jir.12207/fullpdf

Reference43 articles.

1. Classical and modern prejudice: attitudes toward people with intellectual disabilities;Akrami;Research in Developmental Disabilities,2006

2. Labeling-stereotype-discrimination: an investigation of the stigma process;Angermeyer;Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology,2005

3. Direct and indirect methods to measure attitudes toward persons with disabilities, with an exegesis of the error-choice test method;Antonak;Rehabilitation Psychology,1995

4. Perceptions of mental retardation and mental illness;Caruso;American Journal of Mental Retardation,1988

5. Intervening within and across levels: a multilevel approach to stigma and public health;Cook;Social Science & Medicine,2014

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Identifying major research themes in the literature on developmental disabilities in Middle Eastern countries: A scientometric review from 1962 to 2023;Research in Developmental Disabilities;2023-09

2. Developing an inclusive culture through Unified Champion Schools programs: a pilot study on school awareness and attitudes toward students with intellectual disabilities among general students in Taiwan;International Journal of Developmental Disabilities;2023-07-11

3. The experience of stigma in family caregivers of people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: A meta-synthesis study;Heliyon;2023-03

4. Dedicated to Nation but Against Women? National Narcissism Predicts Support for Anti-Abortion Laws in Poland;Sex Roles;2022-07

5. As far as possible: The relationship between public awareness, social distance, and stigma towards people with intellectual disability;Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities;2022-03-31

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号京ICP备18003416号-3