The impact of energy‐based devices on sebum in acne vulgaris: A systematic review

Author:

Jaalouk Dana1,Pulumati Anika12,Algarin Yanci A.13,Humeda Jasmine4,Goldberg David J.56ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine Miami Florida USA

2. University of Missouri‐Kansas City School of Medicine Kansas City Missouri USA

3. Eastern Virginia Medical School Norfolk Virginia USA

4. Division of Dermatology University of Louisville Louisville Kentucky USA

5. Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists, A Division of Schweiger Dermatology Group New York New York USA

6. Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai New York New York USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAcne vulgaris (AV) is a widespread inflammatory skin condition associated with increased sebum production, abnormal keratinization, bacterial overgrowth, and inflammation. Overactive sebaceous glands (SGs) produce excess sebum, promote Cutibacterium acnes growth, and affect acne development. Energy‐based treatments (EBDs), including light therapy, photodynamic therapy (PDT), lasers, and radiofrequency (RF) devices, have emerged as effective treatment options. As the use of EBDs becomes more widespread, it is imperative to understand their effects on skin parameters, such as sebum, in AV.MethodsSearches were conducted in Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The studies included were randomized and nonrandomized trials on facial AV that used EBDs and featured objective casual sebum level (CSL) measurements via Sebumeter. Data synthesis involved percentage reductions in CSL at follow‐ups compared to baseline.ResultsTwenty‐three studies were analyzed. PDT and RF consistently reduced CSL by 30%–40% and 30%–35%, respectively. Laser therapy showed lesser reductions, whereas light therapy varied significantly and studies had a high risk of bias. All EBD therapies were more effective than no treatment and PDT was superior to light monotherapy. Laser therapy combined with fractional microneedling radiofrequency (FMR) or as a standalone was more effective than laser alone.ConclusionNoninvasive sebum measurement provides valuable insights into AV treatment efficacy. PDT, lasers, especially the 1450‐nm diode laser, and FMR are promising for reducing sebum. Standardization of measurement techniques and further research are vital for enhancing treatment personalization, reducing side effects, and improving AV management.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3