Microstructural and flexural strength of various CAD‐CAM lithium disilicate ceramics

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo analyze the microstructural and mechanical properties of various commercial trademarks of lithium disilicate ceramics for CAD‐CAM systems.Materials and MethodsSpecimens of different lithium disilicate ceramics were obtained and randomized into 5 groups (n = 14): EM: e.max CAD; RT: Rosetta SM; EV: Evolith; PM: Smile‐Lithium CAD; and, HS: HaHaSmile. The microstructural analysis was performed by X‐ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM); for flexural strength, the three‐point bending flexure test was used. XRD and SEM data were qualitatively evaluated. Data from flexural strength were assessed with one‐way ANOVA test (α = 0.05) and Weibull analysis.ResultsHigh peaks corresponding to the lithium metasilicate and lithium disilicate pattern with similar intensities were observed in all ceramics in the XRD analysis. SEM images showed similar patterns of crystalline structure in the EM and RT ceramics, while the other three groups presented different crystal morphologies than the previous ones and were similar to each other. No differences were found in flexural strength among the groups (p = 0.28).ConclusionsThe CAD‐CAM lithium disilicate ceramics showed comparable crystalline intensities. The microstructure of the EM and RT ceramics were different from the other groups. Flexural strength was similar among all ceramics.