Comparison of implant placement at crestal and subcrestal levels in aesthetic zone: A finite element analysis

Author:

Özer Taha1ORCID,Acar Gülin1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Hacettepe University Ankara Turkey

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThe success rate of the implant treatment, including aesthetics and long‐term survival, relies heavily on preserving crestal peri‐implant bone, as it determines the stability and long‐term outcomes. This study aimed to demonstrate the stress differences in the crestal bone resulting from dental implant placement at various depths relative to the crestal bone level using finite element analysis.Materials and MethodsThree study models were prepared for implant placement at the crestal bone level (CL), 1 mm depth (SL‐1), and 2 mm depth (SL‐2). Implants were placed in the maxillary central incisor region of each model, and 100 N vertical and oblique forces were applied. The von Mises, maximum principal (tensile), and minimum principal (compressive) stresses were evaluated.ResultsThe CL model exhibited the highest stresses on the implant, abutment, and abutment screws under vertical and oblique forces. For maximum principal stress in the crestal bone under vertical force, the SL‐2, SL‐1, and CL models recorded values of 6.56, 6.26, and 5.77 MPa, respectively. Under oblique forces, stress values for SL‐1, SL‐2, and CL were 25.3, 24.91, and 23.76 MPa, respectively. The CL model consistently exhibited the lowest crestal bone stress at all loads and the highest stress values on the implant and its components. Moreover, considering the yield strengths of the materials, no mechanical or physiological complications were noted.ConclusionsPlacing the implant at the crestal level or subcrestally beyond the cortical layer could potentially reduce stress and minimize crestal bone loss. However, further studies are warranted for confirmation.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference24 articles.

1. Single‐tooth replacement: factors affecting different prosthetic treatment modalities;Al‐Quran FA;BMC Oral Health,2011

2. Longevity of complete dentures: a systematic review and meta‐analysis;Taylor M;J Prosthet Dent,2021

3. Impact of crestal and subcrestal implant placement in peri‐implant bone: a prospective comparative study;Pellicer‐Chover H;Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal,2016

4. Crestal bone changes around implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non‐submerged and at subcrestal positions: a 1‐year radiographic evaluation;Donovan R;J Periodontol,2010

5. The long‐term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success;Albrektsson T;Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,1986

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3